Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Its taylor36/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Per (link): —DoRD (talk)​ 15:59, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Note: I renamed this to match the oldest account. All accounts are already blocked, so if the evidence holds up, the tags will need to be adjusted/added. —DoRD (talk)​ 15:59, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Cabayi (talk) 16:15, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Retagged, closing. Cabayi (talk) 16:17, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Hildajalcott's only edit and edit summary (Edit summary: "I noticed at the top that the articale had multiple issues so I added her height along with a source from her agency’s website.") is extremely similar to edits by Its taylor36 (Edit summary: "I noticed the notice at the top of the page that said this page needed more reliable sources...") Ronz (talk) 23:30, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . GABgab 14:03, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Abbymsmall who is already blocked indefinitely, (and apparently a sockpuppet of Architect 134?) has returned as “Emilymarie10” to make the same, exact disruptive edits she was banned for!

Now, I don’t know how to use the diff template properly so exhibit A, exhibit B. It’s as clear as day. ⌚️ (talk) 16:47, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

On 6 January 2020, the master was blocked Indef for Edit warring, today, they're back and have continued from where they stopped, still adding content from an unreliable news source to Karlie Kloss.  NNADI GOOD LUCK  ( Talk &#124; Contribs ) 20:52, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
What makes you think that the blocked user is a sock of Architect 134? And you should lose that customized signature.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:25, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * From what I saw before I began the page, the title had redirected to something about Architect 134 so I presumed based on that, Abbymsmall may have been a sock of that user. ⌚️ (talk) 21:29, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * began the page. What page?--Bbb23 (talk) 21:34, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * This is what I recall being redirected to. ⌚️ (talk) 21:38, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * This is painful. What was redirected to that archive?--Bbb23 (talk) 21:43, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Uh, from what I remember there was a page notice (?) that said Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abbymsmall is located at that archived sockpuppet investigation for Architect 134. In going there I see about 2 weeks ago someone reported her as a sock of Abbsymal (which personally I suspected as well but never said anything) and it turns out Abbsymal was a sock but I don’t think they addressed Abbymsmall being a sock. How it all relates to Architect 134, I’m really not sure, I’m just going off what I saw. The case was asked to be moved to that archive by user Mz7. I guess redirect may have been a misnomer for this. ⌚️ (talk) 21:54, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I see. The usernames are similar (typical of Architect 134), but it was only Abbsymal that was confirmed as a sock of Architect 134, not Abbymsmall--Bbb23 (talk) 21:59, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Be that as it may, she is blocked indefinitely for edit warring, whereas Emilymarie10 has picked up exactly where she left off down to the verbatim. So Abbymsmall is socking as Emilymarie10. ⌚️ (talk) 22:05, 13 January 2020 (UTC)


 * . They are using the same IP range but different devices. Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:43, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Obvious WP:DUCK making nearly identical edits to Karlie Kloss as Abbysmall  and blocked sock Emilymarie10. See also similarities between drafts created by Emilymarie10 (Draft:Gabriella Brooks (model)) and Barbaramansing (Draft:Bryana Holly). Currently making a string of similar edits with unreliable references to fashion model articles as the previous accounts did, but faster than I can add diffs. Indignant Flamingo (talk) 22:23, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Note to archiving clerk: During cleanup I noticed strong similarities between the Abbymsmall socks and the family of socks, so please merge if appropriate. Indignant Flamingo (talk) 00:50, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

I suspect that the Abbymsmall socks are newer socks of Its taylor36 because of strong style similarities in edits to similar (and sometimes the same) fashion model articles. For example, socks in both cases added information from IMDb, celeb blog, and model agency websites, with unusually long edit summaries that insist on the reliability of the added source. Some style examples:
 * Its taylor36 at Taylor Hill (model), Erin Heatherton , and Romee Strijd
 * Hildajalcott at Sara Sampaio
 * Abbymsmall at Sara Sampaio, Karlie Kloss
 * Barbaramansing at Erin Heatherton, Romee Strijd , Karlie Kloss

There is also the similar username construction for socks (first/middle initial/last). I also note similar edits from IPs such as 93.117.188.85 and 93.117.181.12, which are to the same articles and with similar styles. Indignant Flamingo (talk) 01:27, 21 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Since this is still open, can we add the new quacking duck, who is making similar edits as the other apparent duck socks, with similar edit summaries, to same/similar fashion model articles, e.g. Romee Strijd , Joan Smalls , Alessandra Ambrosio , and Lorena Rae ? Indignant Flamingo (talk) 03:07, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Closing. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 22:00, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm responding to 's note above. Sockpuppet investigations/Its taylor36 is . However, based on the CU log of Its taylor36, Abbymsmall is using the exact same IP range. Therefore, what's needed is an analysis with evidence showing a probable behavioral connection.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:01, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
 * From the diffs presented it looks possible to me. Will look in further detail later. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 02:22, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * In reply to, yes we can. I have added it to the list for this case and blocked it as sock. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 12:07, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I agree with Indignant Flamingo's analysis that this is Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Its taylor36 (same edits to model pages, same edit summaries, etc.) therefore I will merge. Sro23 (talk) 04:27, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See below Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 03:13, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
. Close. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 03:13, 21 February 2020 (UTC)