Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IvanEComposer/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Presented chronologically: At Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Composers the MahlerLover account denies having a COI w.r.t. the Iván Enrique Rodríguez topic (14:20, 31 August 2020) – but that seems highly unlikely if the account were entangled with the IvanEComposer account (which seems likely, hence this SPI submission).
 * 1) Activity of the suspected master before 10 November 2013:
 * 2) * editing article, which was deleted 09:53, 10 November 2013 (see deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Iván Enrique Rodríguez)
 * 3) * editing article, which was deleted 09:54, 10 November 2013 (see deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Ivan E. Rodriguez)
 * 4) * three visible edits at Commons (all relating to Iván Enrique Rodríguez):
 * 5) ** 17:42, 26 October 2013
 * 6) ** 02:43, 27 October 2013
 * 7) ** 04:19, 27 October 2013
 * 8) After seven years of apparent inactivity, the Commons account of the editor becomes active again for four more edits, again all edits pertaining to Iván Enrique Rodríguez: the first of these edits is 00:57, 26 August 2020, the last of these 14:23, 26 August 2020 (see Special:Contributions/IvanEComposer at Commons for intermediate edits)
 * 9) 15:56, 26 August 2020, that is around an hour and a half after the last edit by IvanEComposer at Commons, the MahlerLover account starts his very first (!) edit at Wikipedia .... with the creation of a very substantial (16,438 b) new Iván Enrique Rodríguez draft, already containing some of the Iván Enrique Rodríguez images, uploaded less than two hours earlier by the IvanEComposer account at Commons.

Don't know whether I should put the "checkuser=" parameter to yes? Left it to "no" for the time being, an admin seeing this might know better whether that should be set to yes? --Francis Schonken (talk) 13:59, 2 September 2020 (UTC) Francis Schonken (talk) 13:59, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Steward CU requested at Steward requests/Checkuser. —&#8205;Mdaniels5757 (talk &bull; contribs) 15:42, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * They declined, as an enwiki CU can work with a Commons CU. . —&#8205;Mdaniels5757 (talk &bull; contribs) 16:53, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - TL;DR: No local abuse of Sock policy given no time overlaps. 7 years is a hell of a difference. Crosswiki COI investigations aren't a job for CU. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 09:28, 8 September 2020 (UTC)