Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Izaan Haider/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Syed89 was created the day after Izaan Haider was blocked by. Edited Abu Hanifa in the exact same way. Made nearly exactly the same detailed space-adding edit on Ja'far al-Sadiq (everything except the image change). Commented on Izaan Haider's talk page that they can help in unblocking (see also Izaan's response ). There may be more here, but this is already quacking pretty loudly. ☿ Apaugasma  ( talk  ☉) 04:36, 30 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Also see the removal of Omar vs   . ☿  Apaugasma  ( talk  ☉) 11:47, 31 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Adding their own name (Izaan) to an article . ☿ Apaugasma  ( talk  ☉) 11:59, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

, since they contacted you at your talk page, I thought you might want to see this. If you'd rather not get a ping from me for something like this, please do let me know! ☿ Apaugasma  ( talk  ☉) 11:55, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Now also see. This slightly disruptive editor seems quite determined to go on creating new accounts, so CU requested. ☿ Apaugasma  ( talk  ☉) 14:28, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ plus the following accounts:
 * , closing. Mz7 (talk) 06:06, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * , closing. Mz7 (talk) 06:06, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * , closing. Mz7 (talk) 06:06, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * , closing. Mz7 (talk) 06:06, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

GuyWithReliableSource contacted me at my talk page to discuss my reversal of an image added by, claiming to be a new user and clearly being concerned that I might wonder how they "learned editing in 1 hour".

Like  and Syed89  , GuyWithReliableSource likes to add unreferenced info to the end of a section  , or to make a series of edits the result of which leaves the article in (nearly) the same state as it was before (Izaan Haider:   ; Syed89:   ; GuyWithReliableSource:  ).

GuyWithReliableSource made the same edit at Lal Shahbaz Qalandar as Syed89.

I'm less sure about Aliwalay1214, but they edit the same articles from the same pro-Shiite point of view, are similarly incompetent, and also add unreferenced info at the end of a section, though more often it is added elsewhere. The first edit of was to post at Aliwalay1214's talk page  (which echoes Syed89 doing the same with Izaan Haider ). Like Syed89 opened the account Syed New, Aliwalay1214 recently opened a new account.

Note: Aliwalay1214 is the oldest account here, so if Aliwalay1214 were to be confirmed to Izaan Haider, this case should be moved. ☿ Apaugasma  ( talk  ☉) 17:34, 6 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Just noticed that there is a duplicate case at Sockpuppet investigations/Aliwalay1214. ☿ Apaugasma  ( talk  ☉) 11:46, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * GuyWithReliableSource is ✅ to Izaan Haider (see above). Aliwalay1214 and Aliwalay7861214 are  to each other but ❌ to Izaan Haider. Closing without action. Mz7 (talk) 06:06, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Zero-result serial edits:  (for comparison, see Izaan Haider:   ; Syed89:   ; GuyWithReliableSource:  ).

Made the same exact space-adding and image-changing edit as Syed89  and (minus the image change) Izaan Haider. ☿ Apaugasma  ( talk  ☉) 11:24, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅: please see above. Closing. Mz7 (talk) 06:06, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

This set of five edits by AGoodMan69, achieves much the same as this one and these three by IAMBEAST016, or these three and these three and this one by Syed89 -- Toddy1 (talk) 20:55, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

AGoodMan69 repeating the same edit and again -- Toddy1 (talk) 09:27 & 14:11, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Both IAMBEAST016 and AGoodMan69 placed talk page messages on my talk page with the header "Important Talk" - in both cases the reason what their edits to Jaʿfar al-Ṣādiq had been reverted. You might have thought that a sensible approach would have been to justify the edits that had been reverted - but they did not. -- Toddy1 (talk) 10:02, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * IAMBEAST016
 * AGoodMan69

Various socks post File:Imam_Hasan_(A.S.).png in the infobox of Hasan ibn Ali -- Toddy1 (talk) 18:44, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * AGoodMan69
 * Syed New
 * Syed New
 * Syed New
 * Syed New

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Just in the interest of establishing potential tell-tale: confirmed sock also opened an "Important Talk". ☿ Apaugasma  ( talk  ☉) 11:18, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * , closing. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:23, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Edits the same articles as Izaan Haider and their socks  ; identical idiosyncratic and inconsequential changes of infobox parameters   ; addition of same incorrect (and therefore not very likely coming from two different users) information to infobox. Generally has the same CIR problems as Izaan Haider and their socks. This is likely an ongoing block evasion, so it would be good if a CU would look out for sleepers. ☿ Apaugasma  ( talk  ☉) 13:54, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
 
 * - looks likely, sleeper check seems reasonable. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 02:14, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅, blocked and tagged. . Closing.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:09, 14 October 2021 (UTC)