Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/J18ER/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

We have six accounts all engaged in protesting the refund of tuition fees on University of Reading and Robert Van de Noort (CE of the university). Two accounts have been CU blocked. All the others are blocked.


 * J18ER was created on 19 January and proceeded to include text regarding refund of tuition fees on University of Reading. They were blocked on 9 February by Jauerback as a vandalism-only account. Appeal was declined by NinjaRobotPirate.


 * JJ110 was created on 19 January and proceed to include similar text on University of Reading and also "We want a refund". They were CU blocked by NinjaRobotPirate on 9 February.


 * JA1116 was created on 29 January. They wrote “we want a refund” on University of Reading. They were CU blocked by NinjaRobotPirate on 9 February.


 * Jjjjjj1110000 was created on 9 February. They wrote “we want a refund” and “Refunds please” on University of Reading. They were blocked by Jauerback on 9 February as a vandalism-only account. Their appeal was declined by Yamla. They left the comment “ It this what free speech costs?”.

University of Reading was semi-protected on 9 February for one month by me following a request at RfPP.


 * Ad200000 was created on 11 February. They wrote on their user page "Wikipedia recognised editors think they have power. They do not. If they disagree with you they block you. Simples. No free speech allowed according to them." They wrote text regarding refunds of tuition fees on Robert Van de Noort who is Chief Executive of the University of Reading. Ad200000 was later blocked by me on 17 February as NOTHERE.


 * JLB2000 was created on 10 March. They wrote text regarding refunds of tuition fees on Robert Van de Noort. It was the same as that written by Ad200000; compare & . I have blocked per the duck test.

This may be one person using multiple accounts or meatpuppetry or a mix. All are blocked so no further action is needed. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:24, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''