Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JCKitKat/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Right after a content dispute on a variety of NYC elected officials pages, stemming from a misunderstanding about how a COI account should be using primary sources, this user left a personal attack on my talk page, went to ANI to repeat the same attack and ask I be blocked, didn't seem to get the results she wanted, and then it appears decided to go scorched earth. She deleted all her comments on my talk page, deleted all of the commentary on her talk page, re-titled her ANI on me to be even more bombastic, and then, on the new account (created this afternoon amid this same dispute) edited many of the articles on NYC pols to delete properly sourced info (revenge on my deletion of their improper additions?) and re-named section headings (1, including the same section heading JCKitKat had edited under instead of making a new section, and 2, the same behavior JCKitKat did in renaming the section heading on ANI). Further to antagonize me, seemed to copy and paste text from unrelated ANIs to add to generic template warnings. Sorry I did not provide diffs, on mobile and saw all the alerts. These "two" users only have 45 and 10 total edits, so it shouldn't be hard to track, but if diffs are required I can add them later if this is still open. JesseRafe (talk) 00:43, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ -- Amanda (she/her)  09:56, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Demonslayer666082. I see that JCKitKat has stated that they are quitting. AGFing this a bit, I dropped uw-agf-sock and uw-harass1 on JCKitKat's talk page for if they return. The SandDoctor  Talk 23:03, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Replaced the above two templates with a personalized note. Nothing further to do here, closing. The SandDoctor  Talk 23:10, 31 July 2022 (UTC)