Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JC Kotisow/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
When the master was asked whether they created the sock account just to review and pass their own articles for good article status, in answer there came, "Yes". SN54129 12:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Obviously the sock should be blocked. The question is what sanction, if any, should be imposed on the master. Unless there's other evidence of disruption by the master - and none has been presented - the sanction should be light. However, if the master was foolish enough to create one sock, they may have created others that have gone undetected. I am therefore requesting a CU to look for any other accounts. Bbb23 (talk) 12:57, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
 * The two accounts are ✅ to each other (no surprise there). Other than that, CU found no other related accounts. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 16:18, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I've indefinitely blocked the sock account, and I'll delete their GA reviews. Given 's remarkable honesty, I'm not going to impose any sanctions on them at this time. However they should be aware that any further sock shenanigans are likely to result in a block on their account. Closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 18:52, 14 July 2023 (UTC)