Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JI Hawkins/Archive

Evidence submitted by Declan Clam
JL blocked indefinitely as vandalism-only account. Earl created soon after and proceeded to vandalise the same pages (see Harland Sanders, child molestation rountine on Catholic Church, etc.), was caught and blocked for 24 hours. Declan Clam (talk) 03:33, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Conclusions
Blocked and tagged. MuZemike 05:25, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Jéské Couriano
These users are all socks of based upon behavior; all of them persist in pushing a conspiracy theory that Harland Sanders, Tupac Shakur, and Elvis Presley faked their own deaths; socks are appearing at the rate of one a day. I'm asking for a CU to root out any sleepers and for an IP block; the three users above are the three most recent socks. - Jeremy  ( v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!! ) 07:04, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

CheckUser requests
Requested by  Jeremy  ( v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!! ) 07:04, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
✅



J.delanoy gabs adds 21:22, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Conclusions

 * All blocked and tagged. NW ( Talk ) 21:31, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Jéské Couriano
First night back from Renton, first edit I see is on Talk:Corbin, Kentucky from this obvious sock. Is he IP hopping, or has this one already been checked? - Jeremy  ( v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!! ) 03:47, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

CheckUser requests
Requested by  Jeremy  ( v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!! ) 03:47, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

–MuZemike 02:20, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
✅. . J.delanoy gabs adds  03:11, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Jéské Couriano
This guy makes busting himself too easy. Requesting CU to bust socks and underlying IP. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!! ) 03:08, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

CheckUser requests
Requested by  Jeremy  ( v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!! ) 03:08, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

–MuZemike 17:07, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Both ✅. No obvious sleepers. The range he's on now is too big to block, unfortunately. J.delanoy gabs adds 15:50, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Jéské Couriano
This is the obvious-sock-crank-of-the-day. Can we crank his other socks thru an incinerator, please? —Jeremy (v^_^v Boribori!) 02:04, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by Jeremy (v^_^v Boribori!) 02:04, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

– I already consulted with a CheckUser privately earlier today, and I have been informed that there are no sleepers present. –MuZemike 02:15, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

I already blocked another obvious sock today:



–MuZemike 02:18, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Jéské Couriano
Busted on Talk:Corbin, Kentucky spouting his National Exaggerator drek. Are there any more Fobbies here that a dose of PSI Rockin' β can't get rid of? —Jeremy (v^_^v Boribori!) 20:38, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by —Jeremy (v^_^v Boribori!) 20:38, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

for another check on sleepers. I won't say anything else that I've been tracking myself per WP:BEANS. –MuZemike 04:03, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Newman113 blocked and tagged. –MuZemike 04:12, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * After rechecking the results.... ✅ - Mailer Diablo 00:02, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. <b style="color:navy;">NW</b> ( Talk ) 00:06, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Jéské Couriano
Can one of you smashing people with the business suit and the cane put this guy back in his oncology office and block the door? —<font color="32CD32">Jeremy <font color="4682B4">(v^_^v Boribori!) 07:09, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Added another sock. —<font color="32CD32">Jeremy <font color="4682B4">(v^_^v Boribori!) 07:59, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by —<font color="32CD32">Jeremy <font color="4682B4">(v^_^v Boribori!) 07:09, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

please can you elaborate upon why you think a check is necessary? (bearing in mind that both the named accounts have been blocked indefinitely) SpitfireTally-ho! 07:11, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * JI Hawkins tends to create more than one sock at a time; this check is intended to root out more socks. —<font color="32CD32">Jeremy <font color="4682B4">(v^_^v Boribori!) 07:16, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

to check for sleepers, thanks SpitfireTally-ho! 07:20, 25 January 2010 (UTC)


 * - nothing to do, unfortunately, and no socks that I can see. Sorry - A l is o n  ❤ 04:18, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Jéské Couriano
Can we find out if there's any more home-improvement stuffs lying about? —<font color="32CD32">Jeremy <font color="4682B4">(v^_^v Boribori!) 21:17, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Can we hurry this up? He's showing up almost daily now. —<font color="32CD32">Jeremy <font color="4682B4">(v^_^v Boribori!) 10:01, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by —<font color="32CD32">Jeremy <font color="4682B4">(v^_^v Boribori!) 21:17, 26 January 2010 (UTC)


 * - all socks appear to be blocked. The problem is that this guy is using two fairly busy RIM IP ranges and softblocking them, even, would be problematic. Really sorry :( - A l is o n  ❤ 10:08, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Tagged. ~ Amory ( u •  t  •  c ) 14:18, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Report date January 31 2010, 02:59 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Both rather obvious socks blocked by me earlier. However, requesting sweep to see if there are any sleepers out there--from what I've read about this guy's history, he has a habit of creating massive numbers of socks in a short period of time. Blueboy96 02:59, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Blueboy96


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users
 * This user is rapidly approaching WP:LTA status. A filter has been devised which User:Jéské Couriano and myself are actively maintaining (287) to track this user. -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 18:02, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Requested by Blueboy96 02:59, 31 January 2010 (UTC) Tim Song (talk) 01:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests

✅. I can't identify any sleepers, though. The ranges he is editing from are very busy. J.delanoy <sup style="color:red;">gabs <sub style="color:blue;">adds 00:57, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions

Evidence submitted by Jéské Couriano
We got an autocon here; any more grapes fermenting under this? —<font color="32CD32">Jeremy <font color="4682B4">(v^_^v Boribori!) 06:52, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by —<font color="32CD32">Jeremy <font color="4682B4">(v^_^v Boribori!) 06:52, 6 February 2010 (UTC)


 * ✅ - the following;




 * Possibly two narrow IP ranges blockable, see how things progress, tho' - A l is o n  ❤ 07:00, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Blocked Pranksterdude; I'd already blocked Waterboy55 earlier today and someone else blocked Donowitz within the past 24h. —<font color="32CD32">Jeremy <font color="4682B4">(v^_^v Boribori!) 07:06, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Tagged. Leaving this open on the IP rangeblock issue. Tim Song (talk) 07:47, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Jéské Couriano
Roses are red Violets are blue Could a CU please Wipe out the coming due?—<font color="32CD32">Jeremy <font color="4682B4">(v^_^v Boribori!) 02:42, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Could we speed this up, please? —<font color="32CD32">Jeremy <font color="4682B4">(v^_^v Boribori!) 09:41, 13 February 2010 (UTC)


 * It's second on the list for awaiting Checkuser, will be done shortly, probably later on today, regards, SpitfireTally-ho! 09:55, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by —<font color="32CD32">Jeremy <font color="4682B4">(v^_^v Boribori!) 02:42, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

decline - SpitfireTally-ho! 13:24, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

On second thoughts, endorsed, may be that the range block needs to be wider, if possible, (declined at first because I misread the timestamps on the user's edits). SpitfireTally-ho! 13:30, 11 February 2010 (UTC)



All other users on the ranges spanned by the above two are using different devices or service providers and are unlikely related. -- Avi (talk) 22:11, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Jéské Couriano
Another autocon. Any others down there that need a visit from Cryptosporidium? —<font color="32CD32">Jeremy <font color="4682B4">(v^_^v Boribori!) 00:08, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by —<font color="32CD32">Jeremy <font color="4682B4">(v^_^v Boribori!) 00:08, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Tim Song (talk) 16:20, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

✅

J.delanoy <sup style="color:red;">gabs <sub style="color:blue;">adds 01:00, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Blocked and tagged. –MuZemike 01:02, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Antiuser
Pretty clear from user's edits, especially and  X X X antiuser eh? 07:06, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
account has been blocked + tagged, only just ran a sleeper check this morning, so I doubt another one so soon will achieve much, marking as closed, regards, SpitfireTally-ho! 09:22, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Jéské Couriano
Can we put any more Zoraks back in their collection case now? —<font color="32CD32">Jeremy <font color="4682B4">(v^_^v Boribori!) 07:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by —<font color="32CD32">Jeremy <font color="4682B4">(v^_^v Boribori!) 07:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC)


 * ✅ - no other socks right now, though I'd say there will be soon. Two possible Crackberry /18 or narrower rangeblocks here.


 * - the following accounts, though blocked as socks of, are actually ❌ and should be unblocked;




 * He's actually very easy to verify -  A l is o n  ❤ 11:10, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Reblocked JulesWhinfield as an additional aspect of that account's block was vandalism, which I doublechecked and found valid. —<font color="32CD32">Jeremy <font color="4682B4">(v^_^v Boribori!) 18:54, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Jéské Couriano
I long for the day where this guy gets CU'd without prompting... Any more lemmings we can divert towards the nearest cliff? —<font color="32CD32">Jeremy <font color="4682B4">(v^_^v Boribori!) 10:15, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by —<font color="32CD32">Jeremy <font color="4682B4">(v^_^v Boribori!) 10:15, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

sleepers + IP, the normal drill, kind regards, SpitfireTally-ho!

✅. No sleepers, blocked IP 3 months. J.delanoy <sup style="color:red;">gabs <sub style="color:blue;">adds 20:14, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, Delanoy, but I've added another one I just blocked. —<font color="32CD32">Jeremy <font color="4682B4">(v^_^v Boribori!) 01:37, 22 February 2010 (UTC)


 * ✅ - no others that I can see - A l is o n  ❤ 01:42, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Jéské Couriano
Anything else we can send to Hellgates here? —<font color="32CD32">Jeremy <font color="4682B4">(v^_^v Boribori!) 04:43, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by —<font color="32CD32">Jeremy <font color="4682B4">(v^_^v Boribori!) 04:43, 23 February 2010 (UTC)


 * ✅ - also, already blocked. No others on that /17 range. BTW, this kinda says it all :/ - A l is o n  ❤ 05:01, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Another one: Mr. Mooner 25. —<font color="32CD32">Jeremy <font color="4682B4">(v^_^v Boribori!) 05:20, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ - possible Crackberry /20 range to softblock here, tho' there's collateral damage. I have to ask, though - does (s)he actually believe this Colonel Sanders stuff? Seriously?? - A l is o n  ❤ 05:27, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Given his overall behavior and some of his unblock requests (some of which were hit by the filter), it's more likely he believes it than he's just trolling. —<font color="32CD32">Jeremy <font color="4682B4">(v^_^v Boribori!) 05:28, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * And another. —<font color="32CD32">Jeremy <font color="4682B4">(v^_^v Boribori!) 06:15, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ before you even added it. Also soft rangeblocked now - enough is enough already - A l is o n  ❤ 06:16, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Jéské Couriano
He's back! Any more accounts lying in wait? —<font color="228B22">Jeremy <font color="00008B">(v^_^v Dittobori) 20:51, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Can we hurry this up? —<font color="228B22">Jeremy <font color="00008B">(v^_^v Dittobori) 21:01, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * CAN THE CUs PLEASE HURRY THIS UP?! —<font color="228B22">Jeremy <font color="00008B">(v^_^v Dittobori) 22:10, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by —<font color="228B22">Jeremy <font color="00008B">(v^_^v Dittobori) 20:51, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

, SpitfireTally-ho! 20:53, 4 March 2010 (UTC)


 * ✅ - this lot - all on Crackberry IP ranges. Possible rangeblock, though with collateral damage;



- A l is o n  ❤ 22:23, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Just out of curiosity, how much collateral damage are we talking? —<font color="228B22">Jeremy <font color="00008B">(v^_^v Dittobori) 22:39, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Newer case split out of this one and moved below. Alison: are you okay with this case being archived now, or do you want it left open on the rangeblock matter? Kind regards, SpitfireTally-ho!

Evidence submitted by Jéské Couriano
Hate to bear bad news, but we got another one. —<font color="228B22">Jeremy <font color="00008B">(v^_^v Dittobori) 21:22, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by —<font color="228B22">Jeremy <font color="00008B">(v^_^v Dittobori) 20:51, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

SpitfireTally-ho! 13:19, 11 March 2010 (UTC)


 * ✅ - no others that I can see, tho'. To Jéské: we're nowhere near rangeblocking yet, sorry :( Way too much collateral damage, I'm afraid, and he's spread across a number of ranges -  A l is o n  ❤ 22:24, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Jéské Couriano
Flicks tail irritatedly Any more St. Bernards for Frank Dodd to possess? —<font color="228B22">Jeremy <font color="00008B">(v^_^v Dittobori) 05:36, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by —<font color="228B22">Jeremy <font color="00008B">(v^_^v Dittobori) 05:36, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

–MuZemike 07:29, 15 March 2010 (UTC)


 * ✅ - Just the one, sorry. Crackberry again :( - A l is o n  ❤ 09:44, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Jéské Couriano
Any more Slivers coming from this hive? —<font color="228B22">Jeremy <font color="00008B">(v^_^v Dittobori) 05:45, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by —<font color="228B22">Jeremy <font color="00008B">(v^_^v Dittobori) 05:45, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Tim Song (talk) 05:48, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ - another RIM address, too :( - A l is o n  ❤ 06:00, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Jéské Couriano
It's getting to the point where an abuse report needs to be filed with RiM, isn't it? —<font color="228B22">Jeremy <font color="00008B">(v^_^v Dittobori) 20:55, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Can we hurry up before he whips out the rest of the repo depot? —<font color="228B22">Jeremy <font color="00008B">(v^_^v Dittobori) 20:52, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by —<font color="228B22">Jeremy <font color="00008B">(v^_^v Dittobori) 20:55, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

for sleepers please, the two userpages are classic JI Hawkins, SpitfireTally-ho! 08:43, 18 March 2010 (UTC)


 * ✅ - every one of them. I'm beginning to see reused Crackberry IPs, so there may be blockable wireless nodes ahead ;) - A l is o n  ❤ 01:21, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
 * No immediate sleepers; request that a CU familiar with the history drop me a line before we close this. Mackensen (talk) 01:27, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Line ✅ :) - A l is o n  ❤ 02:03, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Jéské Couriano
Any more, and is a rangeblock viable once again? —<font color="228B22">Jeremy <font color="00008B">(v^_^v Dittobori) 02:30, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by —<font color="228B22">Jeremy <font color="00008B">(v^_^v Dittobori) 02:30, 22 March 2010 (UTC)


 * ✅ - same ol' ... :/ Checkuser's not doing much for you here. Also, upping one IP block to hardblock - A l is o n  ❤ 03:30, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Got another for ya. —<font color="228B22">Jeremy <font color="00008B">(v^_^v Dittobori) 06:53, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ - one of the hardblocks wasn't working for some reason - A l is o n  ❤ 07:03, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Jéské Couriano
Can we spawn-kill any more socks? —<font color="228B22">Jeremy <font color="00008B">(v^_^v Dittobori) 07:59, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by —<font color="228B22">Jeremy <font color="00008B">(v^_^v Dittobori) 07:59, 30 March 2010 (UTC)


 * ✅ - got an IP hardblock in. One of his regular Crackberry access points, looks like. No collateral damage, but IP used two months back & nobody else has since until now - A l is o n  ❤ 08:06, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Scary Gary 1994 tagged as confirmed sock. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:medium; color:#4682B4;"> E lockid</b>  ( Talk ) 17:43, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Jéské Couriano
Any more ants needing the magnifying glass?
 * Can we please speed this up? —<font color="228B22">Jeremy <font color="00008B">(v^_^v Dittobori) 02:49, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by —<font color="228B22">Jeremy <font color="00008B">(v^_^v Dittobori) 02:13, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Tim Song (talk) 02:34, 1 April 2010 (UTC)


 * If the purpose of this request was to find sleepers, then I can report there were none to find. If the purpose was something else, then I totally missed the purpose. Feel free to close the case if we're done, or contact me if we're not! --Deskana (talk) 02:11, 5 April 2010 (UTC)


 * No, that's pretty much it. This user uses numerous IPs along Research in Motion, so I think blocking underlying IPs would be nigh to impossible (unless you nuke all their IP ranges which I wouldn't mind, but unfortunately other people would). –MuZemike 02:15, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Jéské Couriano
He's back from his X-Files wiki vacation; any more unwanted souvenirs in his bag? —<font color="228B22">Jeremy <font color="00008B">(v^_^v Dittobori) 03:31, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * And another. Can we speed this up? —<font color="228B22">Jeremy <font color="00008B">(v^_^v Dittobori) 00:11, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users

 * Added User:Debra_Barone_45 -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 01:41, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by —<font color="228B22">Jeremy <font color="00008B">(v^_^v Dittobori) 03:31, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

for a sleeper check please. Thanks, SpitfireTally-ho! 11:30, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I had recently disabled the filter related to this user due to inactivity. It has been now been re-enabled. -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 01:40, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

No sleepers. --Deskana (talk) 00:33, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Jéské Couriano
Is this walking dishonor to the Barones packing any more socks on his Crackberry range, and can we rangeblock this guy without (unintended) collateral? —<font color="228B22">Jeremy <font color="00008B">(v^_^v Dittobori) 22:18, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by —<font color="228B22">Jeremy <font color="00008B">(v^_^v Dittobori) 22:18, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Fits the pattern between username and contributions. Requesting the typical sleeper check. -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 22:30, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * No sleepers found. --jpgordon:==( o ) 04:35, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

As the listed accounts are blocked and no sleepers were detected, I'm summarily closing this case with no further action necessary. -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 05:00, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by  B s a d o w s k i 1   06:16, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

As usual, to check if a possible rangeblock can be made. -- B s a d o w s k i 1   06:16, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * No sleepers, and rangeblocks arn't a good option here. John Vandenberg (chat) 11:27, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

29 November 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Showed back up today (after a lull of several months) and started his usual B-grade movie plot spoiling again. Is there anything else under Mr. Stubbart that needs sniped? — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 03:16, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Checked, no sleepers found. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 03:22, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Closing. <font color="#C50">Nakon 05:16, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

15 February 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Check contribs. Any more Grunts that need run over by a Warthog? — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 03:04, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
No others found. –MuZemike 03:15, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

05 April 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

See edits. Any more Zerg on the horizon? —<font color="228B22">Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 04:09, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Endorsing to check for any sleepers and a possible IP or range block. Bsadowski1 16:18, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Nada, and afraid not. Amalthea  19:05, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

26 January 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Claimed to be JI Hawkins on userpage. Overall same editing behavior - see all contributions. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 19:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Account blocked by Huon. <b style="color:#151B54">Mike V</b> • <b style="color:#C16C16">Talk</b> 02:37, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Username alone represents a connection with the sock master. See LTA page re JI Hawkins. I have blocked the user; check for further socks. Willking1979 (talk) 04:00, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * to . All previous accounts . Renabled Special:AbuseFilter/287. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 03:27, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * All now blocked, closing. GABgab 04:14, 3 March 2017 (UTC)