Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jack1985IE/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Two accounts and 2 IPs that vehemently object against improving articles by adding independent sources. Common for all four is that they are all "less then cordial" against their opponents when reverting. Like 89.19.67.114 claiming in the summary ''Get a life you sad sad people…… just delete the entire Dublin airport page as it is beyond a joke. The state of it.''. IP 87.198.118.22 come with summaries as ''Why are you insisting on "BETTER SOURCES" for flights which have been operational for years? And why is it that only DUB Airport page is subject to your ridiculous vandalism? I suggest you "GET A LIFE". Sad, sad individual....... and Constant vandalism from "THE BANNER", who wants citations and better sources from airlines operating into DUB for years, such as Lufthansa. Are you bloody serious? Plus Just delete this page entirely. Then Andrewgprout cannot vandalise it any more. Fucking pathetic''. Shamrock2020 come with the same kind of attacks like ''Undid revision 1050739975 by Andrewgprout (talk) You need to be blocked from editing. Leave this article to the people who have actual knowledge of the airline industry instead of constantly removing up to date details and This is absolutely disgraceful, the entire table is in a shambles. It needs to be changed back to the way EireAviation had it. The Banner and Andrewgprout have destroyed it''. In the mean time he removed/reverted added source requests/requests for better sources, just like EireAviation did here. And EireAviation also engages in the attacks [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shannon_Airport&diff=prev&oldid=1048434526 ''Undid revision 1048434323 by Andrewgprout (talk) See my talk page. Again noting bulk removal of material.''] Funfact: he was adding stuff that EireAviotion removed. The same thing happened here [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dublin_Airport&diff=prev&oldid=1048399052 Source re-added ''(removed by the Banner in masse delete they inflicted earlier) which confirms operational airlines and routes ex-DUB from Dublin Airport Authority. Would suggest the Banner and **Andrewgprout bother to check edits which have provided additional sourcing to confirm and verify routes instead of bulk reverting and inflicting vandalism on pages.''] Strange enough, it is only EireAviation who responds to the discussions like Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Aviation, where he comes up again with the usual claims of vandalism. The same as Shanrock2020 and 87.198.118.22 did.

I have the idea that these two IPs and 2 accounts are just one person. The Banner talk 12:11, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * -  Girth Summit  (blether)  12:32, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
 * is ✅ to, and there is clear evidence of abusive use of switching accounts to gain an advantage in an edit war: both blocked and tagged. is ❌ from a technical perspective, and will require behavioural investigation.   Girth Summit  (blether)  13:00, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
 * No behavioral evidence detected. Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:20, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
User:EitiltNua shows the same behaviour as earlier sockpuppets of Jack1985IE: being rude, objecting against the use of sources, removal of maintenance templates and assuming thing without it properly mentioned in the sources given. See the earlier case here About being rude, that happens mainly in the summaries, something earlier sockpuppets did too. Some examples:
 * 1) The user is obsessed with my edits, usually bores out of it but has random bursts of thrawlling through my edits.
 * 2) No source available for ORK-TFS, thus route removed until source can be provided. ORK-AGP not verifable as operating in Winter 2022/2023. (I wont get into the extending winter debate with you as I know you find it quite challenging.
 * 3) Utterly ludicrious a route that extends from summer into Winter is not year round according to the Banner. Stop removing sourced material.
 * 4) Okay, you are clearly warring with me. The route is now year round. Seriously get a hobby this utterly ridicilous.

An example of removal of maintenance templates: here. The same claim as made by blocked user EireAviation here.

Beside that, the name of "EitiltNua2 translates as "New Flight", what fits in my idea that this is not a genuine new user but a block evading account belonging to the collection EireAviation/Jack1985IE. Last time there were also some IP's involved, hence the CU-request and to avoid any sleepers. The Banner  talk 16:53, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The old accounts are stale now, but the IPs used by are consistent with the records in the CU logs for the proposed master. That wouldn't be enough on its own obviously, but various BEANS stuff leaves me with little doubt that this is the same person. Blocking, tagging as proven.   Girth Summit  (blether)  20:19, 23 June 2022 (UTC)