Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JackJillGallaibh/Archive

11 May 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

On 4 September 2015 edits began from the JackJillGallaibh account across several pages and the account was blocked on account of being WP:NOTHERE. Today an editor began making WP:SOAPBOX edits with a focus on one of these pages with a new account, introducing a similar tirade of material that is unencyclopaedic in tone. Comparison of new and old edits particularly raised my suspicion that this is block evasion. Other old edits which may be relevant are and . Drchriswilliams (talk) 10:07, 11 May 2016 (UTC) Drchriswilliams (talk) 10:07, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * I can't comment on sockpuppetry here since all of the sock's edits have been revdeleted, but that account should be blocked per WP:NOTHERE anyway. An admin clerk will have to review behaviour. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 12:35, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Found the smoking gun: and . These two edits from each user solely or heavily rely on the reference from this this Daily mail article. .  Mkdw talk 05:23, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Tagging and closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  14:54, 28 May 2016 (UTC)