Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JackNassar/Archive

Evidence submitted by Peter cohen
These ids push similar positions (often with same wording) at a small group of articles. For example at 'Abud, we can see JN edit RL edit and 212 IP edit JN's edit history again overlaps with RL's and at least one of the IPs at each of Rawabi and Jerusalem which, given how few articles any of these have edited, suggests the same individual is involved. Both registered ids have been blocked for disruptive editing, though they have not (yet) edited during each others' blocks. The JN id is currently blocked. Ramallah has been edited by RL and some IPs but not by JN.

Addendum: these edits by RL restoring a previous version of the article by JN were made during JN's block. Therefore block evasion is now suspected.--Peter cohen (talk) 20:09, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
Behavior does match. Same revert-war style of same text in same articles. Same response on talk-pages for those that comment there. DMacks (talk) 17:01, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by Peter cohen (talk) 16:39, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

There is a repeated pattern at the four articles identified above. I've identified these accounts because of pattern at 'Abud and Rawabi. Jerusalem has many more visitors and also plenty more vandals. I think it is worth checking whether any of the other accounts active there are likely the same person as is active on the smaller articles. It would also be useful to check whether these accounts are covers for a higher profile user.

RL made this edit during the first (and at time of writing only) block listed at.

–MuZemike 19:02, 19 March 2010 (UTC)


 * ✅ - including the IPs, mentioned here per policy due to the level of abuse - A l is o n  ❤ 03:35, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

JackNassar's block is now indefinite, other sock indefinitely blocked also. I don't think blocking the IPs are going to do any good at this time as they're all over the place CIDR-wise. –MuZemike 03:52, 20 March 2010 (UTC)