Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jackiestud/Archive

Report date July 14 2009, 08:46 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

User blocked for edit warring, multiple legal threats, and other reasons. IP locates to Brazil, where blocked editor is from, an has reverted on mass to that editors preferred version of an article. This one quacks Verbal chat  08:46, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Verbal chat


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
 * IP blocked for two weeks for block evasion. Icestorm815  •  Talk  18:28, 17 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Conclusions

Report date September 14 2009, 09:16 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Only actions are reverting article to banned users preferred version. IP locates to correct region. (Banned for editwarring, TE and legal threats - see article edit summaries). This one quacks, so not tagging for CU. Verbal chat  09:16, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Verbal chat
 * IP sock has now restored the material BLP infringing material 3 times. Verbal chat  12:15, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Make that 4 times. Please block them already. Verbal chat  13:39, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

User is evading WP:3RR and is already banned for legal threats and edit warring. Checkuser requested to confirm IP connection. Verbal chat  19:05, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Verbal chat


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by <b style="color:#C72">Verbal</b> chat  19:05, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
 * I've already blocked the account as an obvious, disruptive sock. Up to the checkusers if an IP check is warranted; looks like the IP is already identified, but maybe there are more socks hanging around. MastCell Talk 21:42, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * All ✅. Brandon (talk) 22:10, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions
 * Closing as no further action necessary with MastCell's blocks. <b style="color:navy;">NW</b> ( Talk ) 02:27, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Report date September 23 2009, 10:05 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Returned to same behaviour and socking after 2 week block - see previous case. <b style="color:#C72">Verbal</b> chat  10:05, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by <b style="color:#C72">Verbal</b> chat


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

As such I've blocked the IP for one week, due to block evasion.-- Kanonkas : Talk  11:55, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions

-- Kanonkas : Talk  11:57, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Dougweller
Blocked before for using multiple accounts, contributions and geolocation show that this is Jackiestud Dougweller (talk) 05:38, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * Hasn't edited in three days, sort of stale at this point. Will keep eye on contribs from taht IP. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 02:41, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

28 November 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Similar edit style and content, poor English and similar misuse of sources. I've suspected this for some time but today's edits at Matriarchy, Minoan civilization and Yangshao culture have pretty much convinced me. Checkuser can confirm as we have IP addresses. Dougweller (talk) 12:24, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reopening this. As well as editing similar types of articles, the times of editing seem very similar - Jackiestud was from Brazil. I'm off to bed now but will delve a bit more tomorrow. Dougweller (talk) 21:45, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Any investigation into edits should include the IPs used, see above and, clearly one that was missed (same type of edits/articles, Brazil). Dougweller (talk) 10:01, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * This edit shows her using a source in Portuguese - Jackiestud is from Brazil and edits or did edit the Portuguese wiki (the edit summary is a bit bizarre as no one had removed any Cambridge reference). Dougweller (talk) 21:52, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Unfortunately, the accounts in the archive are and checkuser cannot publicly link named accounts to IPs. Behavioral evidence will need to be the deciding factor. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:31, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * - I don't think we can do a CU here. All we've got in the archive that isn't stale is an IP, and per the privacy policy, CU won't match an account to an IP. No, I think this one will have to be done on behavior. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:32, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Beat me to it... and no EC, either. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:33, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Going to close this. Behaviour evidence suggests that they're not the same editor because User:Jackiestud never edited Minoan civilization or Yangshao culture, contrary to what User:Dougweller said when he filed the report. <b style="color:#0000FF;">OhanaUnited</b><b style="color:green;">Talk page</b> 17:02, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry if I was unclear. Both editors concentrate on articles to do with matriarchy and mother goddesses, I'm very aware about the areas where they don't cross over. Dougweller (talk) 20:44, 28 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Following a discussion I had with Dougweller, I'm reopening this case. He feels it was prematurely closed (and archived), and actually posted a comment on the archive page twenty minutes after it was archived. I've copied it above so all can see. As to the case itself, there is a fair amount of overlap in their edit patterns, and there is other behavioral evidence that makes me think it may be the same editor. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 21:20, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I think this is worth investigating. I've had some experience solving the problems caused by Jackiestud. I took a look at this latest editor's contributions and even at first glance I had a strong hunch this was Jackie. --Folantin (talk) 10:53, 30 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Okay, I'm calling it. Based on behavioral evidence, I've blocked Lorynote for being a sock. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 22:21, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

06 December 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

was just blocked as a sock of (case not yet archived). Clearly a sock, IP geolocates to, same as other Jackiestud IPs, eg - Sockpuppet investigations/Jackiestud. I don't know if CU is absolutely required here given that the IPs are so similar, as are the edits. I would like to see this added to the Jackiestud archive along with Lorynote. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 12:59, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * CU won't match an IP to a user. Having said that, I've blocked the account for block evasion on behavioral grounds for two weeks. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:22, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

14 December 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

WP:DUCK - same IP, geolocation, articles, types of edit. It really just needs adding to the archives. Dougweller (talk) 12:50, 14 December 2010 (UTC) Dougweller (talk) 12:50, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * IP blocked, we're done here. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:08, 14 December 2010 (UTC)