Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jackmarshall052104/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Both accounts have been used to create fantasy game tables and fantasy election results. Compare this version of User:ChristopherJmesTothFan with this version of User:Jackmarshall052104/Sandbox. Both are for a game called "Desert Island Escape (Season 1)". The Jackmarshall052104 account has also edited the ChristopherJmesTothFan user page. Whpq (talk) 03:26, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Given this comment, could I trouble you for some input here? Would knowing about previous inappropriate user pages have changed your course of action here? Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:41, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * As you can see from my comment, I was already aware of the previous existence of inappropriate pages; hence my comment regarding consideration of my action. It seemed to me that taking action on a current page purely by reason of previous pages was a little excessive; you will have noted by warning included in the comment which you have linked. Having said that, if you feel that more decisive action is called for I would not argue the point; it may be that I tend to follow WP:AGF more than is called for. Anthony Bradbury "talk" 12:54, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Pinging properly: .--Bbb23 (talk) 17:52, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
 * That was my thinking also, I just figured I should check with you first. The user pages, while inappropriate, are not so disruptive as to require administrative action, meaning this falls squarely into the grey area between WP:VALIDALT and WP:BADSOCK. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:40, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

We have already established that these two accounts are the same person and were in a gray area as to propriety. Now that the master account has been indeffed for disruptive editing, suggest that this account be indeffed also to avoid block evasion. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:48, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Closing. The SandDoctor  Talk 01:34, 3 June 2019 (UTC)