Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jackrthompson/Archive

12 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Both VOAs, making the exact same kind of edits (compare to ; identical type of vandalism, just one is more extensive). I'm pretty certain that they're linked to a previous master, but I couldn't say who that was off the top of my head; hence the request for CU (as well as to link these two accounts), of course. Luke no 94 (tell Luke off here) 17:52, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The evidence should be right there in front of you, in the diffs above. Both accounts vandalized the developer and publisher sections, the genres, and the plots of the game. It's exactly the same vandalism done in exactly the same way - just using different words. Luke no 94  (tell Luke off here) 16:29, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * -, is there more evidence? Just two (different) edits to the same page do not prove anything.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  10:06, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Vandalizing the same article (which has a history of vandalism) isn't enough to justify a CU check. I have reprotected the article and warned both users for their vandalism -- whether they are the same user or not, if they are VOAs, they can be blocked as such after appropriate warnings and continued vandalism. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  20:11, 16 March 2015 (UTC)