Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jacqueline1961/Archive

17 January 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

User Jacqueline1961 is a single purpose account who created the article Mark Worrall which is currently at AfD. When the AfD started a new account popped up which had no previous contributions and begun participating at the AfD discussion, both appear to be the same person.
 * Both accounts format external links in the AfD starting with Mark Worrall e.g. Mark Worrall blah blah : (Jacqueline1961 )(KingsoftheKingsRoad )
 * Both accounts use the edit summary "reply to comment": (Jacqueline1961 ) (KingsoftheKingsRoad )
 * Both accounts used lower-case reply when starting their comments at the AfD: (Jacqueline1961 ) (KingsoftheKingsRoad )
 * Both accounts have the same odd logic that Amazon establishes notability: (Jacqueline1961 ) (KingsoftheKingsRoad ) &#9733;&#9734; DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 03:06, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Users made edits reasonably close together on 14th and 13th therefore checkuser would be beneficial as it could be definitive. &#9733;&#9734; DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 05:02, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' WOW, sockpuppetry - I've been accused of many things in my time but this sounds positively medieval - what is the penalty? Death by lethal injection? The reason things look similar is pretty straight forward. I only just became acquainted with wikipedia and some of the parlance and was simply cut and pasted by the other users to save time and make sure it was correct and also basically in support of that poor girl Jacqueline who is being victimised for no good reason. Please don't waste your time or my time by replying or furthering your investigation since you clearly have me marked down as guilty of this heinous crime. Simply delete my account. If I could figure a way to do it, I would have done it already. Thank you. Seriously - no hard feelings, enjoy life. KingsoftheKingsRoad (talk) 13:49, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * She is married to the subject, Mark Worrall. Maybe KotKR is he. Note the sense of a knight rising to defend a lady in distress. That would explain the Chelsea1955 account. They could be two people using the same computer. Dloh  cierekim  01:42, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Endorsing check per behavioral evidence presented above. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:25, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The two accounts are ✅ to each other. Note the original account is which should be blocked as well as they are attempting to regain access to it.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  23:49, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * All three accounts blocked indef per CU comments. Closing now. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:50, 18 January 2014 (UTC)