Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jageshwar/Archive

29 June 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Single-purpose accounts focused on IIMSAM, particularly concerned with the apparent secretary-general Remigio Maradona, and "exposing" the person and organization, consistent with edits by the now-blocked  ,. Jageshwar was blocked primarily for BLP violations concerning Sulaiman Al-Fahim and IIMSAM. There appears to be a vendetta extending over a long period. While I can't say I'm impressed with the IIMSAM organization (which appears to be involved in COI editing via IP and which issued legal threats earlier this year), Jageshwar appears to be evading his block. They previously socked with. Pleae check for sleepers, the main accounts are blocked as ducks.  Acroterion   (talk)   03:17, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - on all accounts for sleepers in addition to the above seems to be an obsession with Fox News. Rschen7754 03:43, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Compliments for the clear report; all accounts ✅ with each other, along with . WilliamH (talk) 05:42, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Already blocked. Tagged and close. Dennis Brown &#124; 2¢ &#124; © &#124;  WER  12:36, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

05 July 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The IIMSAM page suffers already for years from multiple single purpose accounts and IPs. Now these 2 IPs show up suddenly with their first edits on the IIMSAM afd Articles for deletion/IIMSAM with the well known lengthy posts.... Please check also for sleepers or others that might have popped up in the mean time at the history of the AfD... L.tak (talk) 08:46, 5 July 2013 (UTC) L.tak (talk) 08:46, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
 * these are telling diffs diff1 of previous sock user:Polio-of-upper-extremity, which has all the contents also mentioned by the new accounts (is the secretary general a secretary general; accusations at the address of Maradona). The 2 socks I am show in their first edits (which are to this AfD) the same behavior.
 * UNangel with many rhetorical sentences, focussing on the IP contributions of Maradonna; etc
 * Crassnodaar states "My additions to the IIMSAM page that recommended its deletion were removed by the IP address based in Dubai, UAE.", while he never edited IIMSAM, so he admits being sock." (here, in a post further detailing the well known items against Maradona, something about money stolen, etcetc)

. L.tak (talk) 09:04, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I've blocked Crasnodaar, Samarkaand and UNangel08  as obvious socks of Jageshwar, a check of sleepers would be helpful. As far as I can tell, only Jageshwar (who appears to have an axe to grind) and the IP that appears to edit on behalf of IIMSAM, have an interest in the organization out of the whole online world. The socks are solely devoted to the subject. The article on Monica Seles  has been a battleground for Jageshwar  and IP socks of IIMSAM in the past.   Acroterion   (talk)   11:44, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Please present at least one diff from the master or a previous sock, and another per account, otherwise no CU will be run. Thanks. WilliamH (talk) 08:53, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
 * - all three ✅; no sleepers found. Frank  &#124;  talk  11:57, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * User:Frank, should we assume these are confirmed, or did you only run a sleeper check on previously known IPs? Before tagging and closing, clarity is needed. Dennis Brown &#124; 2¢ &#124;  WER  14:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you for clearing that up Frank. Tagged and closed. Dennis Brown &#124; 2¢ &#124; WER  15:18, 9 July 2013 (UTC)