Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JaimeB64/Archive

17 December 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Following multiple deletions of Jaime Buelow, User:JaimeB64 was temporarily blocked in the last 24 hours for disruptive behavior in connection with the deleted page. He responded with threats to continue to engage in disruptive behavior. (Admin User:5 albert square deleted some of these comments, but they're in the history.) This appears to be occurring at Opeongo High School, where he appeared to have been involved in the addition of his name and one other name of non-notable people to the list of notable people from that school. I and another user removed those names today twice. Edits from two different IP addresses restored Jaime Buelow's listing, and in the last edit added links to entries for him and someone else on IMDb. Neither IMDb page verifies the claim that these people went to that high school, and I have already explained to the registered user that inclusion in IMDb doesn't establish notability. So, basically, I think this is sock- or meat-puppetry by someone intent on having his own name included in the high school article. —Largo Plazo (talk) 21:53, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Edits of interest by User:Jaime Buelow, referring to his intentions to re-create the article about himself:, ,.

By the way, I've struck out the listing above for User:69.181.253.230. I misread the diffs: he was performing constructive edits. —Largo Plazo (talk) 22:01, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

I've just added the checkuser request flag. Since it's just one IP address now, and one goal is to see if this person is evading the block, it seems reasonable to do this. —Largo Plazo (talk) 22:05, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I've blocked the IP for one week and Linepainter indef as an obvious duck. I don't see the need for sleeper check here though, so I'm declining the CU request. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:09, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Should the block on User:JaimeB64 be extended indefinitely, therefore, as well? By the way, you got in ahead of me; I just finished putting sock templates on the two users' talk pages. —Largo Plazo (talk) 22:17, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I've extended his block for another week. I think that's all we need to do for now. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:22, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I agree, closing now. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:02, 21 December 2013 (UTC)