Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jake-jake Jacinto/Archive

28 April 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

I'm not exactly sure what's going on here but this edit created by JakeJake Cebu claims in the only their third edit that an account made before theirs is an imitation of Jake-jake Jacinto.

I am sure they are both socks of another account - I am wondering if it is User:MarianoRivero. Sorry this report is more than a little vague. Flat Out  '' talk to me 06:33, 28 April 2015 (UTC). Flat Out  '' talk to me 06:29, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * I caught this user adding a lot of "garbage content" on the Jesus is Lord Movement article (see here). User:Lpkids2006 (or User:Lianlaspinas) has been lately been active in editing using different IP addresses and now rarely creates his own account. The JIL article has been one of his targets since last year, but he uses IP addresses in editing. Whenever the IP has been tagged, it becames dormant then a new IP address surfaces again. Please note that Lpkids2006 has been known to add garbage content on his previous edits, most notably at the Enjoy Yourself Tonight article sometime between 2008 and 2009. -WayKurat (talk) 00:42, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Why do you think that is connected? Why do you suspect of being a sockpuppet of  (diff)?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  19:23, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * please disregard my comment re: MarianoRivero. The style of editing and virtual declaration of being a sock by Jake-jake Jacinto reminds me of another long-term abuser but I can't recall who it is. Flat Out  '' talk to me 23:48, 28 April 2015 (UTC)


 * - - Similar user names. JakeJake Cebu claims that he is not Jake-jake Jacinto the same day his account was created . Suspicious.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  17:31, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The main two named accounts are . Insufficient evidence has been presented to check other users, all of whom are anyway. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:41, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * There is insufficient evidence to connect to, much less to . Closing the case.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  23:32, 30 April 2015 (UTC)