Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JamesWittenhall40/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Seeing their edit history, talking points, similar interests, and extensive interaction along the same pages, I am pretty sure there is sockpuppetry ongoing. Stuntneare (talk) 21:29, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

This is absurd. There should be an SPI investigation against the accuser. The person clearly has an agenda to stop improvements to articles he works to degrade. This person is obsessed with suppressing updates on country articles like Bangladesh, India and Pakistan. His goal is basically to remove all information added to these articles. If Wikipedia runs on the whims of users like this person, then it would be a disservice to the encyclopedia. This is garbage.--Solomon The Magnifico (talk) 22:07, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

The accuser was constantly edit warring on the Bangladesh page. The main contention is that I removed the words "lower-middle income economy". According to the World Bank and the United Nations, Bangladesh is expected to graduate into a middle income country by 2026 (see this and this). I replaced "lower middle income" with the fact that Bangladesh is South Asia's second largest economy. My sources (very reliable) included this report and this report. The user insists Bangladesh is a "lower middle income" country, which I find to be nonsense. The user's aggressiveness suggests that he has an agenda here, possibly linked to the Inter-Services Intelligence which constantly degrades Bangladesh articles on Wikipedia.

Do I deserve a sockpuppet investigation for this edit war launched by the accuser?

How long will this take?--Solomon The Magnifico (talk) 12:20, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Using an SPI investigation against new editors to suppress coverage of certain countries smacks of dictatorship. This is unbecoming of an encyclopedia. The accuser is intent on removing all the credible information in the Bangladesh page once he secures a block for me. This is malicious, politically-motivated and a witch hunt.--Solomon The Magnifico (talk) 12:25, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

This has nothing to do with sockpuppetry. The accuser is simply gaming the system to block me. Time will tell if Wikipedia falls for these tricks.--Solomon The Magnifico (talk) 12:27, 2 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Just to warn you all, user Stuntneare went to the Brazil article and deleted the entire tourism section, the energy section and cut the economy section in half. I've already adjusted his barbarities, but be warned that what he is doing is vandalizing the articles.177.142.132.73 (talk) 10:44, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Filer has presented zero evidence of socking in the way of diffs. Even if the two accounts are owned by the same person, the James account has not edited since April. They were not blocked at the time they stopped editing; nor had they ever been blocked. Closing with no action. Bbb23 (talk) 13:48, 2 October 2022 (UTC)