Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jannizzero1/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Both accounts show a clear interest in military history (where Janizzero mainly focusses on the Battle of Fornovo). The most important similarity between the accounts can be found in the [disruptive editing and intimidation of colleague Kansas Bear https://w.wiki/4TN6]. I would like to request checkuser to investigate, partially considering the previously linked discussion and the post of Kansas Bear about harassment. Daniuu (talk) 13:39, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Also possibly of interest is, given the similar mass-reversion of edits by Kansas Bear. firefly  ( t · c ) 11:58, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
 * for all of the socks below. Thanks to all people involved in sorting this case out. --Daniuu (talk) 17:52, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * These three are all ✅, along with:
 * Some of which are already blocked. Note the France-related naming theme on several of these.   you blocked CiarleMagne as an LTA, but didn't mention who the LTA account is; I'm going to hold off on the tagging until we figure that out. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:17, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , I mean to block CiarleMagne as a suspected sock of . You can see their identical edits on Battle of Almansa. --   LuK3      (Talk)   15:24, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * OK, according to the technical data, I'd make  to the bunch above, but the behavioral evidence certainly is strong.  I'll tag them as proven. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:22, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Actually, I found some more. Definitely ✅, along with:
 * -- RoySmith (talk) 17:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , I mean to block CiarleMagne as a suspected sock of . You can see their identical edits on Battle of Almansa. --   LuK3      (Talk)   15:24, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * OK, according to the technical data, I'd make  to the bunch above, but the behavioral evidence certainly is strong.  I'll tag them as proven. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:22, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Actually, I found some more. Definitely ✅, along with:
 * -- RoySmith (talk) 17:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * -- RoySmith (talk) 17:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * -- RoySmith (talk) 17:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * -- RoySmith (talk) 17:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)