Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jaredscribe/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
User:Jaredscribe has been tendentious at Iranian Democracy Movement and its AfD (filling both with WP:SYNTH and WP:HOAX in attempts to save the article, or attempting to close the AfD himself)

Then, User:Trenton698 (a new editor with just over 20 edits) somehow finds that AfD and regurgitates what Jaredscribe has been saying: that the "Iranian democracy movement" is notable enough: Trenton698 - Jaredscribe

Also like Jaredscribe, Trenton698 promotes the "Iranian Democracy movement" in other articles without source or with sources that don’t mention an "Iranian Democracy Movement": Trenton698 - Jaredscribe

Despite only making a handful of edits, Trenton698’s editing fluency shows he's not a new editor:

Both editors share the same time card, American English, and similar edit summaries ("Up-to-date" JaredscribeTrenton698, "according to" Jaredscribe Trenton698 ). Also, both editors misuse "its":


 * its a movement - Trenton698


 * its a "movement" - Jaredscribe ParadaJulio (talk) 11:45, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


 * It is demonstrably NOT a hoax. It would be tendentious for you to persist in misrepresenting it as such, especially after I added
 * Iranian_Democracy_Movement in which the NCRI's 10-point plan was affirmed by the US house of representatives, no less.
 * Which should demonstrate it beyond reasonable doubt that its not a hoax. Wi ll you acknowledge this?  If not, we should dismiss further opinions from this editor.
 * I addressed the allegations of SYNTH in the comments, by offering to have the articles title changed.
 * I did not attempt to close the AfD, I made motion for someone else to close, and to then re-open if necessary on other premises. When the motion was denied, I acknowledged that by commenting motion denied, and I stood down.  This is a tendentious allegation.
 * @ParadaJulio is mis-representing my actions; this investigation strikes me as an abuse of process Jaredscribe (talk) 02:20, 18 March 2023 (UTC)


 * I just made my account. I just said that because the article is sufficient enough to be kept IN MY OPINION. Now, just because I agree with him doesn't mean I am him. I edit about Peru, not philosophy. It is not within my editing range. And just because again I have striking coincidences with some random user that I didn't know of until that AfD. I found that AfD while reading through the mentioned article. So no. Plus, the user edits in like 4 different languages, while I can only do 2 (English and Español). Just wanted to make clear.Trenton698 (talk) 13:18, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Trenton698 is a sock, but not of Jaredscribe. Blocked as a sock of . ST47 (talk) 03:13, 18 March 2023 (UTC)