Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jasmine Carmelle/Archive

26 April 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See Alvin Chea and history. IP predates master but doesn't mean master isn't using the IP to do the same thing they are trying to accomplish with the article. The two registered accounts are extraordinarily clear, even with the use of the pronoun "we". diff of master; diff of puppet; diff of IP. Bbb23 (talk) 00:45, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ As such, I have indef blocked both as they appear to be single-purpose accounts. With regards to the IP, it is quacking, as such it too has been blocked. Tiptoety  talk 00:48, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

26 April 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

After master and socks were blocked, newly registered account made same edit. Bbb23 (talk) 11:16, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Clearly the same user or someone acting on their behalf - blocked and tagged. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:12, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

06 July 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Please see my Talk page. So-elle-a admits to being Jasmine Carmelle and to being the IP. They deny being User:RemoTheDog, who made a similar edit to the Alvin Chea article (the creation of Remo's account predates the creation of Jasmine Carmelle's account by 5 years). So-elle-a claims that they don't want to sock puppet, they are just ignorant, and trying to do the right thing. However, it's a bit hard to credit concerning the WP:SPA nature of their contributions as they seem interested in only that one article. Bbb23 (talk) 19:29, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

After promising to be good ("If you're willing, I can post the content in a sandbox for your review") (, So-elle-a has now destroyed any credibility he might otherwise have had with this edit.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:27, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Blocked and tagged. --MuZemike 19:42, 11 July 2012 (UTC)