Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jasminepedia/Archive

18 April 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

My talk page was vandalized recently. The vandal removed a note I wrote that was a response to Jasminepedia. The first vandal was an IP user, 99.122.0.37. He/she removed my note and wrote, "Why are you deleting referenced websites DJC?" (without signing it). I checked the talk page history to see who did it and then revert the edit. I then warned 99.122.0.37 on their talk page. 28 minutes later, Jasminepedia went to my talk page and did the exact same thing, removing the same note, and writing the same thing, and refusing to sign it. Djc wi (talk) 05:50, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I'm sorry, but checkuser cannot disclose connections between IPs and named accounts. TN X Man 13:03, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Taking a quick look, the edits show them as pretty much the same. No edits by the IP since 8 days ago, so no sense in block it. Bring back if more develops and we'll send a clear warning if not a block. Any action against Jasminepedia should probally be taken at a different venue. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  04:05, 25 April 2011 (UTC)