Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jason.Frisvold/Archive

24 April 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

, Mathfreak231 (talk) 21:50, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Seriously? The wikipedia page of a notable person is deleted, that information is posted on a social media site, and because multiple people who disagree have requested that the page be reinstated, that makes me a puppet? This is a ridiculous complaint. Please provide some form of evidence for this. The IP address accounts you posted are also rather diverse. One is US based, Level 3. The other is in Belgium. I realize that these results can be obtained via proxy, but do people really go to those lengths for a Wikipedia entry? Jason.Frisvold (talk) 00:25, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but, uh, I doubt that two different people would happen to post the exact same reason to bring a page back. Plus, just because they have a lot of friends on Google Plus doesn't automatically make them notable. Mathfreak231 (talk) 14:09, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Even though the page was undeleted, don't you find it odd that there are, like, 3 people (1 registered, 2 unregistered) that have only one contribution and are somehow supporting you? Mathfreak231 (talk) 20:09, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I realize this is archived, but to be honest, I forgot about it. I thought I'd check back and found that the case was closed.  I would like to point out, though, that it's quite easy to look at the revision history of the undeletion page and identify what happened.  Simply put, multiple users edited the page within moments of each other.  As each user saved, they noticed that another user had already edited the page.  In my case, I re-edited the page twice to fix the content into a cohesive block.  It's not nice to leave a mess.  Jason.Frisvold (talk) 00:52, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Closing this: off-wiki canvassing is certainly sufficient to explain multiple people asking for undeletion of the same article. It's probable that the IP and account who left an identical message are the same person, but that doesn't worry me either, can happen to a new user. All in all, I see no intention to mislead/deceive/disrupt by anyone listed. I expect no further problems, so no need for looking into it any further. Amalthea  17:08, 30 April 2013 (UTC)