Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jason532012/Archive

05 August 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

IP signs his edit with name of recently blocked editor. TFD (talk) 03:11, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' I blocked on general principles based on conduct and disruption, but a sock is likely based on behavioral evidence... Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 07:10, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  14:07, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * IP already blocked 1 month as likely sock. Please refile if there is new evidence of socking. Closing.

05 August 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Antisemitism&pe=1&#Discussion where he comments as an IP address, and signs his name as "jason" and says that he was banned. Indeed, Jason532012 was banned for disruptive and offensive activity on talk pages, and this IP address repeats the same activity and anti-Semitic conspiracy theories (example: "the fact is the Jews brought this antisemitism on all by themselves. Over 100 nations are simply not wrong, and you'll never convince any sane person that they were...Have they bilked millions and millions of hard working folks out of their hard earned money with filthy banker's math? Is this why Jesus kicked their tables over in the Temple twice? Did he know?").

He's basically just avoiding his ban to make even longer rants (which have been refuted) and twist history upside down on talk pages.

NOTE: I haven't used SPI before, so I'm not sure if this belongs here, as he admits this IP address is his.  Activism  1234  05:37, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * As noted above, the IP is already blocked, so there's nothing else to do here. If the behavior resumes after the block expires, or another named account appears, please file another case. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 17:21, 7 August 2012 (UTC)