Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JayPritchett/Archive

16 December 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Similar robotic way of adding standard German edit summaries,- similar weird tendencies circling around changing the words "Dari", "Pashtun", "Tajik", as well as creating general hoax links between matters.-----. Adding a CU check request just in case to see whether there are more sleepers. Bests - LouisAragon (talk) 15:29, 16 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Please see for the revision history of the article Demographics of Afghanistan and alike related articles of that nation for a further archive regarding the same type of edits. It gets spammed over every few weeks by single purpose accounts who change such stuff; numbers of ethnicities get changed, Pashtun gets changed into Tajik and vice versa, Tajik into Persian, etc. The official language of Afghanistan is Dari, which they typically change it into "Persian" because of the same obsessive point of view. Here another disruptive example by the same user; . These two accounts do virtually the same thing in the little amount of edits they have. Furthermore, adding links that clearly violate WP:RS such as to Angela Merkel and that other politican is conform his editorial pattern which is virtually solely based on disruption. The fact that they both use the exact same robotic German edit summaries (to be honest with you Vanja, I dont think I've ever seen that to any "noticeable numer" before on eng.wiki) on articles that are mostly not German-related, further links them to each other. Further disruptive edits,-) . - LouisAragon (talk) 20:14, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please, explain what exactly is WP:ILLEGIT in their edits.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  19:59, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * - Please, compare those two accounts.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  20:27, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are ✅:
 * Mike V • Talk 21:17, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Mike V • Talk 21:17, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Mike V • Talk 21:17, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Mike V • Talk 21:17, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

17 December 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Multiple socks were found earlier today, but it seems he decided to make another one today. Per WP:DUCK; (weird robotic German edit summaries typical for earlier exposed socks, obsessive pov-based changed without any reason, etc). Just for the record. - LouisAragon (talk) 20:53, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Vayngsm tagged and blocked indef per behavioral evidence. Closing case for now. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:15, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

21 December 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Same type of name like the master (starting with "Jay"), same typical usage of adding robotic German edit summaries,---- same habit of adding hoax material/making changes to articles such as making everyone Jewish.-- Requesting CU as previous time (a mere 1-2 days ago) it was found that he had other socks too. - LouisAragon (talk) 22:28, 21 December 2015 (UTC) LouisAragon (talk) 22:28, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - I blocked this obvious sock, but a sleepers check is needed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:57, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * . <b style="color:#151B54">Mike V</b> • <b style="color:#C16C16">Talk</b> 00:25, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

24 March 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Obvious socks made after I got a few more of them blocked priorly (therefore hence the "usernames") Notice also the typical German edit summaries like previous CU blocked socks.--. The 2nd account is already blocked, but I'm merely adding it here for the record. Sock one got created one day after sock two was blocked. - LouisAragon (talk) 01:24, 24 March 2016 (UTC) LouisAragon (talk) 01:24, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - sleepers check needed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  01:53, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:28, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility


 * Same distinctive edit summaries in German like all previously CU blocked sockpuppets + sockmaster -> "Links hinzugefügt", (etc.) and "Tippfehler korrigiert". (etc.)
 * Spamming that everyone is "Jewish" without citing any (reliable) source(s). (etc.)
 * Same target articles as before, e.g.; - LouisAragon (talk) 00:51, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I've declined the CU request as apparently all accounts are .--Bbb23 (talk) 12:22, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  20:11, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Uses the trademark German edit summary "Links hinzugefügt" just like the sockmaster + earlier blocked socks. Also, the same trademark editorial obsession with labeling certain ethnicities as "Persians" without providing any sources, as well as adding randomly a wikilink to "Jews". Naturally, this is also an article that has been edited with the same stuff by the sockmaster + his already blocked socks in the past. - LouisAragon (talk) 16:03, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Declining CU as archives are . Katietalk 16:51, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
 * ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  16:21, 8 November 2016 (UTC)