Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jaydeep7070/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Both similar names, time patterns and contributions are too matched to be a coincidence and the article itself hints a campaign. Simply using 2 accounts like this isn't only a policy WP:SOCK violation but misusing for content certainly also is. SwisterTwister  talk  02:23, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * This has been discussed in a few places, and while they're working on the same article and have similar names they have said they're not the same person. From a behavioural perspective, I notice that over the course of fifteen minutes the nicks change four times in four subsequent edits. That reads more like collaboration than socking. I've left notes at both talk pages asking them to disclose their potential paid affiliation and affiliation with each other, but given that they haven't edited in two weeks they probably haven't seen the notes yet.
 * In other words, I'm not convinced they're socks, even if they are editing from the same location. Primefac (talk) 15:41, 7 May 2017 (UTC)


 * ✅, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:26, 9 May 2017 (UTC)