Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jeb2003/Archive

12 January 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Kylery has made edits on a very small number of pages, totalling three. The edits are of a very similar nature to Jeb2003 as they entail a similar style of adding unreferenced lists, generally without the bother of a citation; and the pages have been edited by the suspected puppetmaster within 24 hours either side, e.g. first page 13:48 Wednesday and 15:08 Wednesday; second page 15:23 Thursday and 15:30 Wednesday; third page 10:52 Friday and 15:13 Wednesday. C 679 08:01, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * added Klyle07. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;  Join WER 17:16, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Looking at contribs and deleted contribs makes this pretty ducky. Extended the master's block to a month, indef blocked the two socks.  Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;  Join WER 17:23, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

18 January 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

First and only edits is to remove the sockpuppet block notice on this page []. Thinking this is a duck test sock and that there may be more and a checkuser test should be done due to block evasion and possible sleepers Hell In A Bucket (talk) 04:18, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅. Blocked. . J.delanoy gabs adds  04:28, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Tagged and closing. Rschen7754 07:59, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

13 February 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

I'm thinking this was a sock of this account as well that we didn't catch. Same things as the previous, only one area of interest and no action since block of previous sock which I believe was ip hardblocked (which has expired) is it possible to see by Checkuser if this was also another sock? Hell In A Bucket (talk) 10:46, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ with, to the master et. al. --  DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  12:12, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Blocked both socks, master is already under a 28 day block. Tagged and closing. Rschen7754 09:14, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

13 February 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Removing csd template after author removed six times and counting , history of ip and account socking. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 12:38, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * CU not necessary, article deleted and I suspect autoblock is doing its job. WilliamH (talk) 13:14, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Closing per above. --Rschen7754 09:12, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

11 March 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Quack quack, Can we do a checkuser for other accounts being used to evade the current block and suggest an indef block? Edits like [] and previous talk page manipulations Hell In A Bucket (talk) 07:27, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - It's clear from the timing of these accounts (Jebbey was active last year) that Jeb2003 has been socking well before his current block, before this SPI was originally opened. Requesting CU to see if he has any other socks that have slipped our attention. As for evidence, this is fairly obvious, based on usernames and editing interests. Someguy1221 (talk) 08:17, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * These two are ✅, but I didn't see any obvious sleepers. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:16, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Looks to be resolved. NativeForeigner Talk 21:02, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

13 March 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Quacking loudly, first edits are to revert back to a previous state of last uncovered sock. This is the first edit [] that I reverted and this is the very first edit of brand new account []. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 03:49, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Bit too obvious for CU. Rschen7754 04:33, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Rschen7754 04:33, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

15 March 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Quacking loudly, account and name similarity as well as edit history. Please checkuser if definite proof is needed. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 08:08, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * No evidence presented and account already blocked. Closing. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 23:46, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

28 March 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

block evasions, this is a return sock that has a set group of edits focusing on the phillipines, specifically the malls and tallest building. [] Gaisano Tower Iloilo as shown [] or []. Naming similarities recent confirmed socks include Brother05, Triple05, Jeb5000, Klyle07 which all follow a naming pattern, might also want to do a sleeper sweep Hell In A Bucket (talk) 09:09, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Specifically these two edits  demonstrate similarity. Jeb2003 may be stale by now but there has been editing from other socks in the last month.  Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 20:43, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ along with the last two socks in the archive, Triple05 and Brother05. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 21:15, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. Jafeluv (talk) 00:29, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

31 March 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

[] first edit is to revert a previous sock page []. I think this is a duck case but I would request checkuser, we just did a sleeper sweep last time but I think there is possibly a couple more recently created as well. Block Evasion and prolific sockingHell In A Bucket (talk) 07:50, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:40, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Rschen7754 20:25, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

05 April 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Block Evasion, first edit [] is to reverse back to state of last checkuser confirmed sock [] Hell In A Bucket (talk) 14:25, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 19:39, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. Jafeluv (talk) 20:09, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

14 May 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Block Evasion, Always edits in one specific area and continually reinserts info about Giasano Towers []. Relevant socks prior have naming similarities, Brother05, Carl 5050, Jeb5000. I think it's a duck block but a checkuser can show if there are sleepers out there. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 07:16, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - King of  &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 09:05, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ + & .  Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:26, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I've blocked and tagged the sockpuppets. Closing. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:30, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

23 September 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

I think we have a case of block evasion here. One of Jeb's editing concerns is promotionalism of Gaisano's. I think that the behaviors are consistent with Jeb's behavior as well. No discussion, and the creation time for this account was very close to last sleeper sweep. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 07:55, 23 September 2013 (UTC)


 * This diff shows [] the editing also has similarties in the use of lists such as []
 * This also shows both of those behaviors [] and there is little to no discussion from either master or sock. The last part I put into consideration is that this account was made or first edited from [] after the last sleeper sweep and given the history I think that there is good reason to run search for other block evading socks. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 13:26, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Rschen7754 09:02, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Diffs have been provided. However, prior contributions by Jeb2003 and his known socks are all stale (more than 3 months old), so there's nothing here that a CheckUser would be able to compare with.  This one will have to be decided on the basis of behavioural evidence (the duck test).  —  Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 19:25, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Blocked sock, Rschen7754 09:22, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

18 April 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This is behavioral. Username Similarities with master and several confirmed socks. Also the primary interest of the accounts are Giasano's and lists, I can't link to most of the past behaviors because the articles have been deleted. This is for sure too old for a checkuser but I think if you look at the deleted page histories from the talk page you can see the lists obsessions and giasano obsessions which is the only edits the new account has made too. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 17:24, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked per WP:DUCK. Closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 14:49, 20 April 2014 (UTC)