Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jeeteshvaishya/Archive

27 September 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Extensive undisclosed paid editing documented at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard&diff=681927762&oldid=681916824 diff]).

All the accounts named here are engaged in promotion of Ravi Tripathi and Saurabh Dudeja. Brianhe (talk) 15:31, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Saurabh_Dudeja&oldid=645761293]] Saurabh Dudeja created by Jeeteshvaishya
 * [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ravi_Tripathi&oldid=528128265] Ravi Tripathi created by Jeeteshroxx
 * [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Inspirational_fiction&diff=prev&oldid=597707652] Penthoughts inserts Saurabh Dudeja book to list
 * [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&diff=prev&oldid=598733123] Shubhamsinha120 at AfC for Saurabh Dudeja

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * There are two more accounts involved here: and, both of which are stale. The former is not a sock but a meatpuppet as it's the account of the business partner of the listed master. The latter could be a sock of either. As all accounts are pretty stale, not sure there's much by way of CU to do here. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  05:41, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

13 October 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

First edit was to remove the AfD template on Ravi Tripathi who is a testimonial on their PR agency's website. The master is blocked per COIN investigation. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  18:22, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * is . He made two edits only and both were with a mobile app. The master used a mobile app only once I believe, and that edit is stale.
 * is ✅. Blocked and tagged.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:44, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'm boldly closing both SPIs now; the first one because there really isn't anything that a CU can do and the accounts aren't editing so there's no reason to evaluate until one of them starts again and the second due to a lack of technical connection on one account. These will be documented in the archive and that should be helpful in future should we come to it. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  03:15, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

01 November 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Artist2cre8 recreated an article that Jeeteshvaishya created and reposted after an AFD. Pretty duckish but worth checking to see if there are other accounts. SmartSE (talk) 15:50, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked and tagged. . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:10, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The sock account was created a few days after master was blocked (21 September 2015→16 November 2015). New account operator is capable of creating entire articles with correct table formatting on his first edit, definitely not a new user. They have returned to maintain one of the master's creations here. The IPs made edits to the same article with same or nearly same edit summary and  and. whatismyipaddress.com reports they are all static IPs which may be related to use on commercial premises. The sock and the IPs are all SPAs at the article created by the master and a related article. ☆ Bri (talk) 02:17, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I'm not convinced that this is the same user, there haven't been any edits for a couple weeks so not too high a priority. Closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:32, 27 August 2017 (UTC)