Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JenniferDombrowski/Archive

23 January 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This user has a conflict of interest with Jennifer Dombrowski and is repeatedly removing a number of statements due to this, and another editor known as just after performing the same thing, so I am assuming that it could be a sockpuppet, but I am not certain. TBrandley (what's up) 03:05, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * The real issue here is that this user doesn't understand Wikipedia policy, or the Internet for that matter. This matter really needs to be discussed on her talk page and the article's talk page. She needs a good explanation more than she needs another template, IMHO. -- Mesconsing (talk) 03:27, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * It's fairly obvious that is  is . 174 get's a final warning at 01:29, Jen is created at 01:54. Jen receives her final warning at 02:41, and Asndm9 is created at 03:01. I have some sympathy for her assuming she really is the subject of the article, but this is deliberately avoiding scrutiny. Someguy1221 (talk) 03:24, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I have blocked the IP and indeffed the sock account. As I said, I have sympathy for her, but we can't allow her to hop on a new account in lieu of having a discussion every time someone (or four different people) disagrees with her. I have left a message on her first account's talk page explaining a bit of Wikipedia procedure. I've also offered her help with removing BLP violations and making a deletion request - help that she needs more badly than a banhammer. Nonetheless, I have blocked her for 48 hours to make sure she responds, instead of simply creating yet another account and renewing the disruption. Someguy1221 (talk) 03:36, 23 January 2013 (UTC)