Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jeremyb949/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Self-proclaimed meatpuppets active only at Articles for deletion/Amy Osmond Cook & the article Amy Osmond Cook. for (talk)  08:28, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

So, I'm definitely not violating any policies that I'm aware of and I'm certainly not engaging in "sock puppetry." I've been a contributor here on Wikipedia for some time, and have been careful to make sure that all my articles are objective, notable, and properly cited. What the community is doing to me and my account, at this point, is foreign to me but it feels drastic, targeted, baseless and unwarranted. I'm not really sure what to do but I would like to get my account and reputation back. It's a shame to see this level of an attack on my account occurring even though I have contributed valuable content to the platform. I wasn't aware that Wikipedia and the user community operated in this manner but at this point, I'm glad I am aware.

Jeremyb949 (talk) 18:21, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

I'm not sure how I got placed in this investigation, but I am certainly no sock puppet.

I hope that this will dispel any false accusations that there is any sort of sockpuppetry going on. I appreciate your concern and attention to this matter. Would you please let me know what else you need from me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amyosmondcook (talk • contribs) 03:55, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * All accounts are ❌. The accounts have disclosed their relation to the article subject, so the closing administrator can take this into consideration when deciding what action to take. I don't think any action is needed for now as they aren't acting deceptively. Mike V • Talk 23:31, 18 August 2016 (UTC)