Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JesusLuna19/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The names of users are similar, in addition to that they make the same pattern of editions. ,, and. Bradford  Talk  10:00, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Sockpuppet account blocked as it's pretty transparently the same user - synonymous name, making the same kind of edits within minutes. The master account has already been repeatedly warned and blocked once for continued unsourced disruptive editing, so I have also indefinitely blocked that. Marking this as closed as I think that's all the action needed right now; but please re-report if they reappear. ~ mazca  talk 10:56, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( moved from this sockmaster)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Blogwriter66 shares a common interest in Madison Taylor Baez with prior socks of this editor. See this log entry on Commons and this diff on Simple.

This then may link to sets of SPIs together, because Blogwriter66 in this diff has added Baez to an article that the JesusLuna19 sock team have an interest in. Obviously those are blocked already

On that basis I suggest Checkuser, since this is all rather intricate Fiddle   Faddle  18:30, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Noting the heading here: "This SPI case may involve cross-wiki abuse. Please consider reporting the results on meta or Checkusers can send an email to the interwiki checkuser mailing list if required." and the behaviour on other Wikis, Commons and simple, is there virtue in reporting the results to meta? Actually I imagine this was going to be done, but I thought I'd ask  Fiddle   Faddle  19:09, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * User:GeneralNotability FYI, Blogwriter66 was indeffed on simplewiki for socking, and they also have (deleted) contribs on Commons. Do you think it's worth asking a steward for a check/lock? --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:26, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - overlap in interest with past socks + LTA is enough for me to endorse (and request a sleeper check), and would like to establish the relationship between this group and the JesusLuna group. GeneralNotability (talk) 18:07, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Everyone is ❌ to Arshifakhan61. JesusLuna19 is ✅ to . Blogwriter66 does not appear to be related to anyone, but that is on the basis of their single edit to this wiki.
 * please create a new case for JesusLuna19 et. al. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:52, 3 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Split case to JesusLuna19 per CU request. GeneralNotability (talk) 19:37, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * JesusLuna and YisusMoon . : if these were Arshifakhan socks I would have requested a lock, but I'm not doing so here since these are a different master. GeneralNotability (talk) 19:45, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * , understood. Thank you Fiddle   Faddle  20:15, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * , good spot! I'll shoot Operator873 (the blocking admin on simple) a note to see who else they are. GeneralNotability (talk) 20:29, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * , Operator873 says it was a duck block as...wait for it...a suspected Arshifakhan sock (based on the Madison Taylor Baez interest, no less). CU here says "unrelated," but probably worth keeping an eye on Blogwriter's edits, if they move into obvious duck territory we can take another look. GeneralNotability (talk) 20:55, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

If the name alone wasn't enough, they began by recreating one of the sockmaster's articles, here.  Onel 5969  TT me 00:44, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:13, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The SandDoctor Talk 14:12, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Similar names and same pattern of disruptive edits on the same article. ,. — Young Forever (talk)   20:56, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ~ mazca  talk 23:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)