Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jets100/Archive

11 May 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Pretty obvious looking at their contribs. Küñall (talk) 03:19, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Puppet indeffed and tagged based on duck. Master blocked for two weeks. There is evidence of disruptive activity,, although I acknowledge that the reporter should have provided that evidence. In at least one instance the two editors edit-warred in tandem.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:33, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
 * A prima facie case for abuse of multiple accounts has not been made here.  is not blocked or banned, so the possession and use of an alternate account is not a violation of policy per se.  If the second account is being used to influence consensus or disrupt the project, please provide diffs of the edits showing similarity between the accounts as well as at least one diff showing disruptive activity. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 14:19, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

29 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

See below. Bbb23 (talk) 15:40, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
. I blocked these four accounts based on a report at WP:ANI about the disruptive behavior of GreekGreenAnarchist100. All four behaviorally correlate easily to the master and to other blocked (but not confirmed) puppets. I'm opening this up partly for the record because so many accounts have been blocked without reopening this SPI and partly to endorse a CU. The master is stale, and I believe all the socks blocked outside of this SPI are also stale (there are a lot of them - I checked a bunch but not all), but these four accounts are not, and a CU can be run with just these four accounts, which would give us a baseline for the future, as the master seems to be fairly active at creating new ones.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:40, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I looked at these after seeing the ANI report. They are ✅, and you got all of them. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 15:51, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Taking a small amount of liberty, I retagged the accounts. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:20, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

31 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

One of this user's socks was tagged and blocked at ANI on Sunday. This new account was created almost immediately afterwards, edits in the same topic areas with misleading canned edit summaries, and is even redoing some of the latest sock's exact edits (e.g. vs. ). Ivanvector (talk) 11:58, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Ping, because you acted at the ANI. Should have done that earlier, sorry. Ivanvector (talk) 15:03, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅, no sleepers. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 17:23, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Accounts blocked and tagged. Mike V • Talk 20:01, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

21 June 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Same old, same old. He doesn't even bother to change his moniker noticeably from his earlier User:GreekSocialist100 or User:GreekGreenAnarchist100 and others. Shameless. Poeticbent talk 16:54, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Obvious, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:06, 21 June 2015 (UTC)