Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jgbuford/Archive

08 January 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Users are pushing the same content to the articles Yazidi Book of Revelation and Al jilwah. Rbnccarter has no edits to articles other than these two. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 23:47, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Evidence, as requested by User:Mark Arsten: Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 22:36, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * diff on Al jilwah, by Jgbuford
 * diff on Al jilwah, by Rbnccarter
 * diff on Yazidi Book of Revelation, by Rbnccarter

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * It may be worth noting that User:68.11.129.178 and User:106.177.33.149 were also tag-team editing with Jgbuford for a while. When confronted, Jgbuford claimed that 68.11.129.178 was not his ip address and that he was not using multiple accounts, but the nature of 68.11.129.178's and 106.177.33.149's edits suggest that they were at least editing in a coordinated (possibly meatpuppet) manner. -Thibbs (talk) 11:25, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
 * 1) At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
 * 2) At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
 * 3) In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:16, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Endorsing check per behavioral evidence above. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:59, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The two accounts are ✅.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:10, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Confirmed sock blocked indef and master blocked one week per CU findings, closing now. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:43, 16 January 2014 (UTC)