Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jhmiklavcic/Archive

01 February 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

All are interesting solely in promotional edits at Another Language Performing Arts Company.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  09:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * This SPI is the likely the direct result of my post at WT:SOCK. The two primary contributors to Another Language Performing Arts Company seem to be closely connected to the subject of the article. has declared their COI both  and .  has not declared a COI yet, but the similarity of their user name to the name of one of the founders of the subject of the article and promotional content they've also been adding to the article leads me to believe they are also connected its subject in some way. Anyway, COI is not really what led me to post at WT:SOCK; it was  by  made not too long after I added COI and Connected contributor templates to the article. Not too long after that talk page post, another new account,, also made some similar edits to the page. It's possible that none of these accounts are the same person and are really just a members of group of Utah-based newspaper contributors, writers, community activists, archivists, and historians and a loose association of academic and secular persons who are marginally aware of the group who really are interested in trying to address the problems of the article, but it seems like a bit of a WP:DUCK to me. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Endorsing my own request.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  09:33, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Alexislevitt and Felix utah are ✅.
 * Slcjan is . They are the only account/user who is using a phone.
 * Jhmiklavcic and Bamiklavcic are but also possibly relatives.
 * Overall, with the exception of Alexislevitt and Felix utah who are apparently one person, the users, to the extent they’re separate individuals, are all affiliated with each other and have no other interest than to promote the company. On that basis, I have indefinitely blocked all of them as I see no reason, for example, to retain the master whose interest is not in benefiting the encyclopedia. Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:18, 1 February 2016 (UTC)