Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jiam Momin/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

User:Sattari Malda created Sattari,_Malda. User Sattari Malda user page redirects to that article. User:Jiam Momin redirect to Jiam Momin, both of which have been created by Sattari Malda. Finally article, Jiam Momin, states, "Welcome to my user page. Hi, I m Jiam Momin I m a student of class (xi) at Sattari High School from Sattari Malda.I like social media & I like edit Wikipedia." Not only is this likely sockpuppetting, but also a fundamental misunderstanding of how Wikipedia (user) articles function. 1, 2, 3. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 07:44, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - CU declined, the 3 users are clearly . Not malicious but purely unresponsive and lacks competency.  QEDK ( 後  &#127800;  桜 ) 16:59, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * QEDK - ✅. I've blocked the master for one week and indef'd the puppets.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   17:02, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Repeatedly creating and editing the same promotional articles, random moves with the same nonsensical edit summary ("its help for common people") , general promotional and competence issues. Sockmaster was previously blocked for 1 week, and I warned them about using multiple accounts here, after which the sock returned. Brad v  15:33, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:32, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Right back to the same article as before, with the same writing style. Amin Mia Brad  v  16:14, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Sock tagged. Closing. Sro23 (talk) 00:54, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Recreating same self-promo article as before, although now it is at Amin Mia (politician) as the original title was salted. Brad v  20:09, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I'd say this passes WP:DUCK although I am surprised that this time the sock chose what's probably his actual name as his username this time. The new article is substantially the same (although not identical) to previously deleted ones. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:23, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Given that the recreation is more or less the same, plus the overlap on articles like Sattari, Malda, . Please indef sock. Sro23 (talk) 19:06, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Sro23 - ✅.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   19:07, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Creating more non-notable drafts (Draft:Sattari Jame Masjid, Sattari Jame Masjid), similar edits to Sattari, Malda, similar username as previous accounts. Brad v  16:17, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

FYI. Brad v  16:24, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I've blocked this as an obvious WP:DUCK. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:26, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Recreating the same mosque article (in sandbox); more pointless edits to Sattari, Malda. Brad v  16:04, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked. Sro23 (talk) 05:21, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Recreating same draft as before, similar edits to Sattari, Malda, similar username. Brad v  13:16, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - . Please block the new sock indefinitely. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:33, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Mz7 (talk) 03:22, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Similar username to previous accounts, same edits to Sattari-related topics. Brad v  20:28, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * This is an absolute DUCK case, and I had in fact already blocked Momin01 before I saw this report. This sockpuppeteer has repeatedly evaded blocks by using new sockpuppets, and is therefore site banned, in accordance with Banning policy. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:27, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

User page gives the name of the sockmaster. Similar edits to Sattari, Malda and Draft:Sattari Jame Masjid. Brad v  14:30, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ + . Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:56, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Quack Praxidicae (talk) 13:32, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . GABgab 17:39, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Similar edits to Sattari, Malda and Sattari Jame Mosque. In the one case, the username is obvious. Brad v 🍁 14:59, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Adding Jamemosque do this nomination as well. All of these, and all of the socks in the archive, are focused on these two articles, as well as a couple of deleted promotional articles that they seem to have given up on. Let me know if you need more information, but I believe it's pretty straightforward. Brad  v 🍁 05:39, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Changed status to requesting CU, may as well make this air tight. -- The SandDoctor Talk 18:51, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * SJM786 is, and the others are ✅. . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:37, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

User making edits / attempting page move of Sattari, Malda and Sattari in same vein as Sockpuppeter and many of their Sockpuppets. e.g. Spike &#39;em (talk) 14:00, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

The main editting crossover I noticed is with User:Newpara and User:Samsungz2m, both of whom are blocked socks of Jiam Momin.Spike &#39;em (talk) 15:34, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Compare this talk page edit with this one or this page move with this one (mentioned above) The user has spammed mine and 's talk pages trying to get more of these page moves done. Spike &#39;em (talk) 20:45, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Or this edit with this one and this one.

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  23:24, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
 * - Potentially worth boo The SandDoctor  Talk 14:07, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Removing CSD tags from pages created by him. RhinosF1(chat) (status)(contribs) 07:30, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * IP hasn't edited since, closing. GABgab 21:04, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

User is recreating G5'd articles such as this and this who were created by Jiam Momin or one of their socks. Kb03 (talk) 16:22, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅, no obvious sleepers., closed. Katietalk 16:25, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Suspicious activity was recreating Patharchapuri Dargah Sharif, an article which Jiam Momin has repeatedly tried to publish signed,Rosguill talk 16:10, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  22:25, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 * - Per behavioral evidence. Thanks, GABgab 19:34, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:16, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
 * While looking at the account that was checked, I saw two more:
 * I don't think I'm supposed to add them to "suspected" after a CU has already ruled. However, those two accounts have substantially similar contributions to multiple pages, see for example Bareilly Sharif Dargah, Binodpur Gram Panchayat. I'm still investigating, but I'll likely block all three. ST47 (talk) 16:59, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Okay, these are the only three I can find for now. The re-creation of Patharchapuri Dargah Sharif with the same content as a previous sock and the extensive editing of pages previously created by socks like Sattari_Jame_Mosque is pretty damning. All three will be, and I'm going to be deleting a number of articles as well as being created by a blocked/banned user. ST47 (talk) 17:04, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Done speedying the pages that have now been obviously created by socks, didn't find any more suspicious accounts that are still active, recommending closure. ST47 (talk) 17:35, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Another user account was kind enough to present themselves on my talk page. The lack of any substantial prior history, the interest in multiple articles that they never contributed to (user has 0 deleted contribs), and the username (I wonder what JM stands for) made me decide to block. I probably should have opened a new check for JRhistory and RJ3492 earlier, but I didn't realize that they'd be back so soon. I'll let a clerk or CU decide whether to check JRhistory, RJ3492, or JMcreation for sleepers. ST47 (talk) 05:44, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Done speedying the pages that have now been obviously created by socks, didn't find any more suspicious accounts that are still active, recommending closure. ST47 (talk) 17:35, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Another user account was kind enough to present themselves on my talk page. The lack of any substantial prior history, the interest in multiple articles that they never contributed to (user has 0 deleted contribs), and the username (I wonder what JM stands for) made me decide to block. I probably should have opened a new check for JRhistory and RJ3492 earlier, but I didn't realize that they'd be back so soon. I'll let a clerk or CU decide whether to check JRhistory, RJ3492, or JMcreation for sleepers. ST47 (talk) 05:44, 7 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Everyone's now blocked, closing. GABgab 20:49, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Random article moves of articles here, here similar to confirmed socks like User:JMM000, User:Amin Mia (Member) Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:52, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - All the socks in the archive are stale, so the CU request is . If you want us to conduct a more thorough behavioral review: In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
 * 1) At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
 * 2) At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
 * 3) In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 23:57, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I've reviewed the moves and I'm not prepared to block on that alone. Best, Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 23:57, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅ plus:
 * Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:01, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:01, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:01, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:01, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:01, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

New account recreating repeatedly socked page Shehnaz Quadery after it was deleted via G5. Requesting CU to verify and find any other possible sleepers. Kb03 (talk) 02:02, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * CU data on the master is stale, and it's not a technical match to previous socks from the August 21 SPI, but based on WP:DUCK behavior I'm going to indef as a sock. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 02:17, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Obvious duck is obvious. See username and copying the same move here Praxidicae (talk) 21:04, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Duck indeed. GeneralNotability (talk) 13:10, 9 July 2020 (UTC)