Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JibinGs/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Obvious SPAs (either socks or meat) on Adventure Emirates, which the alleged master created. The registered account popped up to add material and remove a tag, and the IP geolocates to... wait for it... Ajman in the UAE. GABgab 21:06, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The two accounts definitely seem suspicious given the edits made to the Adventure Emirates article (now deleted). I would say that sock puppetry is probable, but I don't have any proof that directly links the accounts to one another. I would say that meat puppetry is more likely, given the fact that the accounts were created on the same day.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   15:42, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Sounds good. Given that they're now inactive, I'm going to close. GABgab 22:46, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Bonvallite is ❌. I know of no other master, among all the Degioia masters I'm aware of to whom Bonvallite is related.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:18, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * This account's Draft:Adventure Emirates - in its earlier version - reminds me of Sockpuppet investigations/Albulalisaid, plus, who may well be the actual master of the aforementioned case. Thought this was worth mentioning, considering it's an odd coincidence. GABgab 20:42, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are ✅:
 * This is fairly obviously paid editing with a general pattern of article creation. I've blocked the unblocked accounts without tags. Please figure out which account is the oldest and either stick them in the existing SPI or create another one. Then they can be tagged.
 * Bonvallite is ❌.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Will do. And just out of curiosity, was previously blocked as a sock of Albulalisaid; do they fit into this picture, or are they just meat? Thanks again, GABgab 21:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Curiosity killed the cat. Anjalidharmapalaae is ❌ and not meat, either.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:59, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Another sock,, popped up on Jibin George Sebastian. No need for CU, but a block would be much appreciated. Thanks, GABgab 00:43, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I was going to report this as well. IP 180.215.123.156 twice removed 's CSD noms, and now suddenly an SPA pops up to do the same. I strongly suspect that the IPs are Waffen, particularly because of their poor attempts at contesting the G5 speedy delete nom. "the article was created before the ban it must not be speed deleted as it will be violation of CSD 5 if its deleted" No, obviously Waffen was indeffed long before the article was created. However, I'm curious what should ultimately be done about Jibin George Sebastian. Could it in fact be speedied under G5? Apart from normal article tagging and cat additions and other maintenance issues, the only substantive content was added by an IP in the 180.215.* range. If we believe this is the same person, can we delete? Do we consider the tagging and cleanup edits to be "substantial"? (Cue new SPAs fleshing out the article to skirt speedy-delete rules, I say cynically.) Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:33, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * This is fairly obviously paid editing with a general pattern of article creation. I've blocked the unblocked accounts without tags. Please figure out which account is the oldest and either stick them in the existing SPI or create another one. Then they can be tagged.
 * Bonvallite is ❌.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Will do. And just out of curiosity, was previously blocked as a sock of Albulalisaid; do they fit into this picture, or are they just meat? Thanks again, GABgab 21:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Curiosity killed the cat. Anjalidharmapalaae is ❌ and not meat, either.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:59, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Another sock,, popped up on Jibin George Sebastian. No need for CU, but a block would be much appreciated. Thanks, GABgab 00:43, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I was going to report this as well. IP 180.215.123.156 twice removed 's CSD noms, and now suddenly an SPA pops up to do the same. I strongly suspect that the IPs are Waffen, particularly because of their poor attempts at contesting the G5 speedy delete nom. "the article was created before the ban it must not be speed deleted as it will be violation of CSD 5 if its deleted" No, obviously Waffen was indeffed long before the article was created. However, I'm curious what should ultimately be done about Jibin George Sebastian. Could it in fact be speedied under G5? Apart from normal article tagging and cat additions and other maintenance issues, the only substantive content was added by an IP in the 180.215.* range. If we believe this is the same person, can we delete? Do we consider the tagging and cleanup edits to be "substantial"? (Cue new SPAs fleshing out the article to skirt speedy-delete rules, I say cynically.) Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:33, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * This is fairly obviously paid editing with a general pattern of article creation. I've blocked the unblocked accounts without tags. Please figure out which account is the oldest and either stick them in the existing SPI or create another one. Then they can be tagged.
 * Bonvallite is ❌.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Will do. And just out of curiosity, was previously blocked as a sock of Albulalisaid; do they fit into this picture, or are they just meat? Thanks again, GABgab 21:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Curiosity killed the cat. Anjalidharmapalaae is ❌ and not meat, either.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:59, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Another sock,, popped up on Jibin George Sebastian. No need for CU, but a block would be much appreciated. Thanks, GABgab 00:43, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I was going to report this as well. IP 180.215.123.156 twice removed 's CSD noms, and now suddenly an SPA pops up to do the same. I strongly suspect that the IPs are Waffen, particularly because of their poor attempts at contesting the G5 speedy delete nom. "the article was created before the ban it must not be speed deleted as it will be violation of CSD 5 if its deleted" No, obviously Waffen was indeffed long before the article was created. However, I'm curious what should ultimately be done about Jibin George Sebastian. Could it in fact be speedied under G5? Apart from normal article tagging and cat additions and other maintenance issues, the only substantive content was added by an IP in the 180.215.* range. If we believe this is the same person, can we delete? Do we consider the tagging and cleanup edits to be "substantial"? (Cue new SPAs fleshing out the article to skirt speedy-delete rules, I say cynically.) Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:33, 27 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Pinging to help with merging this individual report into the aforementioned SPI, and moving it to the oldest account, JibinGs. Thanks,  GABgab 21:18, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * This was copied from Sockpuppet investigations/Waffen77. Closing now.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:23, 27 June 2017 (UTC)