Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JimmyTwoShoes fan/Archive

03 March 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

As per LifeBaka's comment on the matter at hand, I'm filing an SPI case against JimmyTwoShoes fan here. The user Wikipedian explorer, who is the creator of Template:User Jimmy2Shoes, the name of which bears resemblance to the sockmaster. He was also blocked on eswiki with the block summary of being a sock of JimmyTwoShoes fan, and I trust their judgment on him. In addition to being blocked for abusing multiple accounts, both the sockmaster and Wikipedian explorer are interested in the same topic. :| TelCo NaSp  Ve :|  06:22, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
If you noticed the block log he was unblocked by a CheckUser and given a chance per a discussion with him that he wouldn't abuse any more accounts. --Bsadowski1 06:25, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * closing: no indication of any enwiki socking violations since the user was offered a second chance via the account (see: User talk:190.234.1.221IP & Wikipedian explorer's blocklog). SpitfireTally-ho! 15:17, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

27 March 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Similar special interest in the articles surrounding the Jimmy Two-Shoes character, as indicated in Special:Contributions/Profisur calamardu regarding diffs here and here, as well as inappropriately redirecting this obscure page, which had recently undergone an MfD discussion that closed with consensus to userfy the page without a resulting redirect. Note that the previous request was archived because there was previous agreement according to the block log that the user sticks to one account only, and this would seem to be a violation of that agreement. :| TelCo NaSp  Ve :|  02:48, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Wikipedian explorer was told to keep to one account, but based on this edit, I have a feeling they're not. CU to clarify. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 03:20, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * is, but I can say that the two listed accounts are ✅ socks of one another. Tiptoety  talk 05:00, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Blocked both accounts. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 05:08, 27 March 2011 (UTC)