Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jimmysonoma/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Duck, Recreated Fake Obsession under Fake Obsession (UK band). The master earlier created DJ 4Rain, and after I left a paid warning on his talk page, but, later he blanked the draft and  from his userpage. GSS (talk |c|em ) 14:25, 1 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Actually, Sonalika420 was registered a few days after was blocked and there is some evidence of undisclosed paid editing and sockpuppetry, please check your email. Thank you – GSS  (talk |c|em ) 05:07, 17 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Please note that I have already filled a new case for Hydrozen1 since a newly registered user has recreated Draft:Our Town America (an exact copy of the deleted version). Thank you – GSS (talk |c|em ) 17:39, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Group 1 are ✅ to each other:
 * - Please, compare the two.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  20:20, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Group 2 are ✅ to each other:

to group 2

Group 1 and Group 2 appear ❌ to each other. Blocking all except BrayLockBoy. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  21:48, 31 October 2018 (UTC) — Berean Hunter   (talk)  21:53, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Also FYI for who blocked HansDelbrück in group 1 in case this helps him at COIN.
 * - Please check due to the overlap at Draft:Fake Obsession and obvious spaminess. As GSS notes above, this may be Hydrozen1. Thanks,  GABgab 21:32, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I concur with 's findings. In addition, these accounts are very :
 * Hydrozen1 is to this group based on several factors. All of these accounts are ❌ to BH's findings. I am blocking Sonalika420 for obvious paid editing without disclosure. Clerks should determine whether to file a new case for Hydrozen1 or the group 2 accounts. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:33, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
 * There's enough differences between the three groups that this looks like multiple paid editors working on the same job. I've spun this out into three cases at Sockpuppet investigations/Fakeobsession and Sockpuppet investigations/Hydrozen1. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:11, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hydrozen1 is to this group based on several factors. All of these accounts are ❌ to BH's findings. I am blocking Sonalika420 for obvious paid editing without disclosure. Clerks should determine whether to file a new case for Hydrozen1 or the group 2 accounts. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:33, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
 * There's enough differences between the three groups that this looks like multiple paid editors working on the same job. I've spun this out into three cases at Sockpuppet investigations/Fakeobsession and Sockpuppet investigations/Hydrozen1. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:11, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * There's enough differences between the three groups that this looks like multiple paid editors working on the same job. I've spun this out into three cases at Sockpuppet investigations/Fakeobsession and Sockpuppet investigations/Hydrozen1. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:11, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Don't know (or care) if this is meat puppetry but it's very clearly continued paid editing per the last set, recreating Paul Harrop Praxidicae (talk) 15:23, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * , article salted to extended-confirmed. AfC may recreate the article if the draft is accepted. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:23, 13 June 2019 (UTC)