Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jinnhoppan/Archive

19 December 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Easy one. Same naming style, created in rapid succession of each other,--- same target articles (basically), same reinstatements of nonsensically info over and over that gets reverted. Asking for a CU as there might be some sleepers. Bests - LouisAragon (talk) 22:42, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Added today's sock, Zarahus101. Incidentally, Groooeoootarr555 appears to be the oldest account, so if it's confirmed, the case file should be renamed. Favonian (talk) 14:58, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - sleepers check needed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  00:37, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Group 1 – the following accounts are ✅:
 * Group 2 – the following accounts are ✅:
 * Group 3 – is  to Group 2.
 * Group 4 – is  to Groups 1, 2, and 3.
 * Groups 1 and 2 are to each other.
 * I've blocked the unblocked accounts in Groups 1 and 2. I've tagged the accounts in Group 1. I'll leave the rest of the tagging decisions to a clerk and .--Bbb23 (talk) 17:20, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, ! If it's not one and the same person, they certainly "self-identify" as equivalent, so I'll tag them as such and close up. Further instances or clones will be terminated on sight. Favonian (talk) 18:12, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I copied group 2 to Sockpuppet investigations/Zarao099884556.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 3 – is  to Group 2.
 * Group 4 – is  to Groups 1, 2, and 3.
 * Groups 1 and 2 are to each other.
 * I've blocked the unblocked accounts in Groups 1 and 2. I've tagged the accounts in Group 1. I'll leave the rest of the tagging decisions to a clerk and .--Bbb23 (talk) 17:20, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, ! If it's not one and the same person, they certainly "self-identify" as equivalent, so I'll tag them as such and close up. Further instances or clones will be terminated on sight. Favonian (talk) 18:12, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I copied group 2 to Sockpuppet investigations/Zarao099884556.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, ! If it's not one and the same person, they certainly "self-identify" as equivalent, so I'll tag them as such and close up. Further instances or clones will be terminated on sight. Favonian (talk) 18:12, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I copied group 2 to Sockpuppet investigations/Zarao099884556.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

11 February 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

User Odaiup reinstated the exact same content which previously CU blocked socks had added.(-- etc.) The same "Odaiup" furthermore made another edit on an article where socks of Mughal Lohar had caused some sticky terror in the past.

Lastly, obvious sock "Vega star 7777777777777" passed the duck test on Darius I as well, where he reinstated the same content "Odaiup" had added, while making a talk page section where he wrote a comment, that is of the very same content as a CU blocked sock of "Zarao099884556" had added through an edit summary..

- LouisAragon (talk) 21:45, 11 February 2016 (UTC)


 * , ; added another one which he created after this last sweep (listed down below), just some days ago, on 9 April. Exact same naming style, same target articles (e.g. --), same nonsensical hoaxes and so forth. Its possible that he has made even more of them again while this has been put on hold for some time now. Bests - LouisAragon (talk) 23:48, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Not again. The Mughal-related articles were so peaceful and stable without this disruptor. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 16:55, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Highly :


 * Highly, but only to the above.  if making a connection to the above:


 * Highly, to the group right above,  to group 1,  if making a connection to the above:
 * -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 11:52, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * . Please see Sockpuppet investigations/Mughal Lohar and Sockpuppet investigations/Zarao099884556. I have a fair amount of history with these three cases and have tried, with some difficulty, to keep the technical findings straight as the behavioral evidence, which is typically a better indicator than CU evidence, is too complicated and interwoven, yet not interwoven, to sort out in these cases. Not to mention that everyone has different views on what it all means. Yet, for the most part the technical evidence has been fairly consistent in pointing to one of the three masters, although I have noticed a few anomalies, which is not surprising as the body of technical evidence grows. As I'm sure you've noted, many of the accounts above have already been tagged (by me or at my direction) as being confirmed to a master other than Jinnhoppan. Bottom line: I'm not sure what a clerk is going to make of your findings in light of mine. One final note: there've been more SPIs related to the other two masters than to this one.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:20, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I had seen stronger connections like confirmed throughout my results, as you have listed in your previous findings, and I don't object to those, and would instruct a clerk to take your results over mine in that. I wouldn't have an issue saying the three groups are different people. I have not, as far as I have seen, connected anything to Jinnhoppan and the group. So I'm kind of unclear what your asking for at this point. If it's better, feel free to drop me a mail. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 13:31, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅. I've put this case on hold while we talk privately.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:08, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 11:52, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * . Please see Sockpuppet investigations/Mughal Lohar and Sockpuppet investigations/Zarao099884556. I have a fair amount of history with these three cases and have tried, with some difficulty, to keep the technical findings straight as the behavioral evidence, which is typically a better indicator than CU evidence, is too complicated and interwoven, yet not interwoven, to sort out in these cases. Not to mention that everyone has different views on what it all means. Yet, for the most part the technical evidence has been fairly consistent in pointing to one of the three masters, although I have noticed a few anomalies, which is not surprising as the body of technical evidence grows. As I'm sure you've noted, many of the accounts above have already been tagged (by me or at my direction) as being confirmed to a master other than Jinnhoppan. Bottom line: I'm not sure what a clerk is going to make of your findings in light of mine. One final note: there've been more SPIs related to the other two masters than to this one.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:20, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I had seen stronger connections like confirmed throughout my results, as you have listed in your previous findings, and I don't object to those, and would instruct a clerk to take your results over mine in that. I wouldn't have an issue saying the three groups are different people. I have not, as far as I have seen, connected anything to Jinnhoppan and the group. So I'm kind of unclear what your asking for at this point. If it's better, feel free to drop me a mail. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 13:31, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅. I've put this case on hold while we talk privately.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:08, 12 February 2016 (UTC)


 * , any news? ☺ ·   Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  04:00, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * . and I have agreed to let me take over this case and the other two cases. I will be making new findings, but it may take some time.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:51, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are :
 * The following accounts are ✅ to :
 * I will block and tag as appropriate shortly.--Bbb23 (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 10:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are ✅ to :
 * I will block and tag as appropriate shortly.--Bbb23 (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 10:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I will block and tag as appropriate shortly.--Bbb23 (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 10:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I will block and tag as appropriate shortly.--Bbb23 (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 10:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I will block and tag as appropriate shortly.--Bbb23 (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 10:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I will block and tag as appropriate shortly.--Bbb23 (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 10:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I will block and tag as appropriate shortly.--Bbb23 (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 10:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I will block and tag as appropriate shortly.--Bbb23 (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 10:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I will block and tag as appropriate shortly.--Bbb23 (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 10:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I will block and tag as appropriate shortly.--Bbb23 (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 10:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I will block and tag as appropriate shortly.--Bbb23 (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 10:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I will block and tag as appropriate shortly.--Bbb23 (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 10:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I will block and tag as appropriate shortly.--Bbb23 (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 10:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I will block and tag as appropriate shortly.--Bbb23 (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 10:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I will block and tag as appropriate shortly.--Bbb23 (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 10:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I will block and tag as appropriate shortly.--Bbb23 (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 10:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I will block and tag as appropriate shortly.--Bbb23 (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 10:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)