Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jismonjohny/Archive

09 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

No evidence as such for these ones as they have not edited any articles. These user names actually came to my attention after DQB reported them to UAA. The user doesn't actually seem to have edited yet, what they seem to have done is created multiple accounts for some reason and I cannot see why or that they have a legitimate reason for doing so.

Looking at the accounts, the names are similar and they were all created within minutes of each other:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log/Jismonjosepjsj

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log/Jismonjohny

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log/Jismonjosephsj

As they have not edited yet I am giving them the benefit of the doubt and I've blocked two accounts, leaving them one to edit from. The one I have left unblocked I will leave a message on their talk page advising about multiple accounts. I am requesting CheckUser though just to make sure that DQB has picked up all the accounts though and not missed any. 5 albert square (talk) 00:58, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * The diffs are here:, , Ivanvector (talk) 21:27, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I could not locate the diff where DQB reported the usernames, could you provide them here? Important: CUs cannot conduct checks where there is no definitive indication of abuse or violation of policy. - Mailer Diablo 08:59, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Jismonjosepjsj and Jismonjosephsj are ✅ the same, while Jismonjohny appears . Might be a coincidence. All three should be blocked for violating the username policy. - Mailer Diablo 18:12, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * All accounts have been blocked. Mike V • Talk 18:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)