Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jjjssswiki/Archive

24 July 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

SPA !votes (here and here) at Articles for deletion/Dominic davis WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:49, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I came across Dominic Davis' Wikipedia page and enjoyed the article. The note at the top of the article says "Please share your thoughts on the matter at this article's entry on the Articles for deletion page", so I did. It was my first comment on Wikipedia, and I felt good about being able to share my thoughts on the article. Now I'm being accused of being a sockpuppet? , My comments were entirely my own. No one told me or directed me to do anything on Wikipedia, be it jjjssswiki or anyone else.

This experience has led me to do more research. I would like to note that WikiDan61 who accuses me of sockpupperty clearly has an ax to grind here if you review the discussions regarding Dominic Davis, Los Buzzardos, and The Peacocks. That includes him demeaning all of the artists involved and attacking anyone who has anything positive to say about the page.

People like WikiDan61 make me regret ever sharing my independent and positive opinion here on Wikipedia.Bapplebaum2012 (talk) 16:44, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

The allegation of sock puppetry is completely false: I have no idea who those users are, I did not write any of those comments nor did I write from any other user account and I did not direct anyone else to make any comments on any Wiki article. I will note that the accusation comes from WikiDan61, who has nominated for deletion Dominic Davis, The Peacocks as well as Los Buzzardos, which were all created by myself, and this fits right in line with the steps he has taken thus far. As to Los Buzzardos and The Peacocks he admits that “I am not a particular follower of the genre of music” yet he nonetheless somehow believes that he has enough knowledge to nominate all three pages for wholesale deletion (not just some type of edit). Further and more importantly, he insults and humiliates Dominic Davis who he derisively describes that he just “stands in the back with a bass”, together with an air of discrimination. He attacks anyone that has anything good to say about any of these pages, as he is doing here with this sock puppet allegation. The Wiki community should not allow whatever personal grievance that user clearly has against these artists or against myself, be it something about us personally, our background or otherwise, to be involved in these Wiki articles. Jjjssswiki (talk) 17:27, 24 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Response I do not appreciate being called a "sock puppet" just because I am a fan of Dominic John Davis and was excited to happen onto this page.  I, along with many others, just want to see this talented man be recognized.  I'm not in the habit of making comments on Wikipedia but in this case I felt it necessary.  By the way, all comments I have made are entirely my own.  And the insults I am reading from one wikidan61 (the same one who has made the sock puppet accusation) as to these artists that are the subject of these pages are alarming.   Michigan51

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  18:49, 30 July 2012 (UTC) — Berean Hunter   (talk)  19:25, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
 * to confirm socking.
 * and are ✅ with Bapplebaum2012. It seems behaviourally and technically  that all the accounts are related. WilliamH (talk) 19:03, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Master blocked 48 hours and socks indeffed and tagged. Agree that the balance of evidence is the behavioral evidence here.