Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jjwilliams98/Archive

18 May 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

As per evidence that emerged in Articles for deletion/The Richard Bunch, User:Jonfleminghubby is a likely block dodge attempt, given the similarity of editing pattern (creating hoax articles about non-existent TV shows.  Catfish Jim  &#38; the soapdish '' 11:22, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Lets clear this up if these two are actually the same so we can tag them that way/mark for the record. All are already blocked. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  02:55, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

✅ and socks not blocked: Keegan (talk) 07:32, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

04 February 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

New user creating hoaxes identical to ones created by this sockmaster and other blocked accounts, most recently with Charity Williams. MikeWazowski (talk) 17:50, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * CU is marginally unnecessary, as this is plainly obvious. Blocked and tagged the sock per WP:DUCK. I don't really see any reason to run a sleeper check yet, but relist if this sort of thing continues. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 18:29, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

20 February 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Obvious sock is obvious, and quacking. Same pattern of creating hoax TV show articles (It's Just Love this time), almost duplicate username. MikeWazowski (talk) 19:17, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ as being the same as. TN X Man 19:43, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * So blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 01:41, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

24 February 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Not as obvious as prior sock account, as there's no direct ties to prior edits, but it's another new user with yet another incredibly detailed article about a TV series that doesn't exist. Should be checked, IMHO. MikeWazowski (talk) 20:47, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Appears ❌. On second thought I probably should not have checked this one, level of English in those articles is different enough to make it unlikely, and at that point the supposed connection was thin to begin with -- I've seen loads of editors over the years create fake series articles. :/ Amalthea  22:13, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Nothing to do here.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  22:18, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

27 March 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Yet another new account, creating hoax articles about non-existent TV shows allegedly created by "J.J Williams" - this time with The Love Life. MikeWazowski (talk) 13:42, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ as being the same as,. TN X Man 13:56, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 23:04, 28 March 2012 (UTC)