Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jmao1/Archive

Evidence submitted by Hu12
Long term use of wikipedia as a vehicle for advertising and promotion for "RHUB Communications, Inc" software. See Spam case --Hu12 (talk) 06:58, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

CheckUser requests
Requested by Hu12 (talk) 06:58, 24 November 2009 (UTC)


 * - Though, I will note this looks like a duck case to me. Tiptoety  talk 19:38, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
✅ =.

No comment on the IPs.

Other accounts are. J.delanoy gabs adds 02:36, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Conclusions

 * All listed accounts blocked indefinitely and tagged appropriately. No action taken on the IPs. NW ( Talk ) 23:18, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by AlistairMcMillan
Please see the list near the end of Articles for deletion/Rhub communications. A number of sockpuppets have been used in the past and now we have two accounts with minimal unrelated edits promoting an article about this company again. I'm not clear on whether this is valid reason for checkuser. Please let me know if you need more detail or clarification. AlistairMcMillan (talk) 00:19, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users

 * I encouraged User:AlistairMcMillan to file this SPI, and it deserves some CU attention because of the very similar modus operandi to the half-dozen other socks who are interested in some small company. For instance, here's the sockmaster adding the company to Web conferencing as well as creating the article; here's the suspected sock doing a similar thing. Alistair did the legwork to come up with a list of pages created versus sockpuppets involved, which clearly shows CU as being needed. tedder (talk) 02:06, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * ✅ == . Relation to Jmao1 is uncertain because that account and all previously confirmed ones are.
 * is . Same general area, but different ISP and computer. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 21:30, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * All accounts but Bmaigatter blocked. Bmigatter is presumably a meatpuppet but not enough in violation to deserve indef blockage. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:29, 1 November 2010 (UTC)