Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jmcnamera/Archive

Evidence submitted by Vexorg
I'm not sure exactly who Junief is a socketpuppet of but it's a new user and straight in with long term contentious edits Vexorg (talk) 17:12, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by Vexorg (talk) 17:12, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

to check the filer of this case,, against , per this and this. Also endorsed to check against. If it does turn out that Vexorg was editing from the IP then a warning may be all that's needed. SpitfireTally-ho! 19:22, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The IP was me. I was just inadvertently logged out at the time. There was nothing deliberately sinister about that. I edited one of the articles back under vexorg. I have nothing to hide about my belief the edits I am inserting those articles should be there and wouldn't have filed this report if I didn't want to draw any attention to the edits. I filed this report because I believe is a sockpuppet. Vexorg (talk) 22:35, 1 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Please see the history of only one article. Vexorg is engaged in a slow edit warring as themselves and as IP. Their edits were reverted by at least two other editors quite a few times(and I am not talking about suspected socks here), but Vexorg keeps coming back with the same bogus categories as themselves and as IP. And it is only a single article! IMO it is a time, for a ban because Vexorg is hardly doing anything useful anyway.--Mbz1 (talk) 01:23, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Please stop chasing me around with your Political agenda Mbz1. I'm not actively editing as an IP, that was a single instance where I was logged out and made just THREE EDITS. I've made over 3,000 edits as Vexorg. Yet you've picked upon it to add to your stalking. Go away!!! Sorry to the administrators that my stalker has followed me here. Vexorg (talk) 01:49, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Very well then, no worries regarding the use of the IP sockpuppetry-wise. It was a non-malicious accident that happened by forgetting to log in. In future, please mention things like that when filing an SPI case. Kindest regards, SpitfireTally-ho! 05:44, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I think you may be missing the point. My IP (Logged out) was nothing to do with this sockpuppetry report. I reported the user because I believe this editor is a sockpuppet because of the nature of diving straight into these contentiously edited articles. Vexorg (talk) 15:10, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, but as I was looking into the situation I noticed that you had edited from the IP while logged out, and when queried about it later, you made no response, leading me to believe that you may have used the IP maliciously. However, now that you have stated that you accidentally used the IP, there is no problem in that regards, and this case is currently awaiting a checkuser to investigate any link between and . Regards, SpitfireTally-ho! 15:13, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Ahhh OK. I understand now. thanks :) Vexorg (talk) 15:42, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * No worries. Collapsing this for brevity. Kind regards, SpitfireTally-ho! 17:49, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

The following users appear to be the same person: I can block the IP for a few months with account creation disabled, if required. That might get the person to stick to one account. Or we can just block the accounts in question. I shall let a clerk decide. --Deskana (talk) 02:31, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * }
 * }
 * }
 * }
 * Blocked and tagged. Tim Song (talk) 03:24, 5 April 2010 (UTC)