Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jmjocson62/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

as previous user account creative telenovelas and films now maked on sandbox shown copied article on infobox television template Oripaypaykim (talk) 15:11, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * I see evidence like as jimike jocson / jocson family as real filipino username after disruptive editor and hoaxes without sourced all telenovelas hoax sure is possible made sandbox is happened. Oripaypaykim (talk) 10:00, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please, compare the two.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  00:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The technical connection between the two is . PhilKnight (talk) 23:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Jmike.jocson blocked and tagged. PhilKnight (talk) 23:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

as per WP:DUCK the same surname called jocson discovered created draft made any television show in Philippine vandal Oripaypaykim (talk) 10:40, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  23:20, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Sock indeffed and article deleted. Closing.

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

as per WP:DUCK, new account between 2 username of jmjocson are same, obviously that request on its talk page about related ABS-CBN drama. Oripaypaykim (talk) 07:09, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Per the above, this is obvious enough to not require CU attention. There's also nothing to check against. Please block the new sock indefinitely. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:54, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * , closing. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:41, 23 October 2017 (UTC)