Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jo0doe/Archive

Evidence submitted by Lvivske
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ukrainian_Insurgent_Army&curid=1413465&action=history

This user with a randomly mashed up username suddenly appeared to argue the same argument Jo0doe was arguing; me thinks he's using this sock to deflect attention from his main account (which has been banned multiple times) Львівське (talk) 19:06, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

I got a message on my wikipedia page that my name is mention in sockpuppetry case. But I see now it is rather that I am accused by Lvovske. I don't know who is JoDoe, I agree with what he wrote on the Ukrainian Insurgent Army talks page. I don't know what else to say. Tg68tg67rf573ur (talk) 20:09, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Strange accusation. I agree for check my IP and rest appropriate info - since I'm not guilty nor knew the editor which tried to get same as me and a quite easy answer - were at book exist a conclusion which added to several articles and which contradict to major scholar sources conclusions and facts (including a cited book itself).Jo0doe (talk) 12:39, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
Probably not a Jo0doe sock, judging by the language patterns.--Galassi (talk) 20:53, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The language patterns are actually what I picked up on at first...--Львівське (talk) 21:09, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Tg has better grammar, but apparently dislikes commas. His word order does betrays a russophone. However Jo0doe is usually barely comprehensible. Looks more like a meatpuppet to me.--Galassi (talk) 22:03, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
The two accounts are ❌. TN X Man 17:28, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * More likely rusophone with similar views than a sock. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 01:34, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

03 December 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "'' Jo0doe, a currently banned user with a history of pro-Soviet / anti-Ukrainian disruptive views registered an account on the commons and had a file name changed / falsified the info to support his POV. He then went to the article linking the image as an IP user, and made an argument that the image is incorrectly used.

< falsifying info 2 < requesting it be removed

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Hi! If you need my assistance to establish my identity, I can give out my personal info (name, phone number etc)

Meanwhile, I find the reaction of user Львівське somewhat paranoic. If the file was mined, someone must have been blown up by that mine. Why it had to be the mine layer himself? I just noticed some staggering discrepancy on a frequently visited page and reported it to the community, so what's the point of prosecuting my (dynamic) IP address instead of expressing me your profound gratitude? 216.239.84.155 (talk) 03:33, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Your English is too good to be Jo0doe, my bad, but the timing was terrible on your part.--Львівське (talk) 23:45, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
. CUs generally do not link IPs to accounts per WMF privacy policy. Elockid  ( Talk ) 12:55, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * IP hasn't edited in nine days or so, so I'm closing this for now. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 16:04, 12 December 2010 (UTC)