Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jogoblin/Archive

10 July 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Part of this is based on Jogoblin's user page/bio the rest is based on his are of focus and recreations of Joker (AFD at ) and Joker venom (AFD at ). Both were pointed out to Jogoblin here (at "A number of things").

After Joker Venom was deleted as a plot only recreation, Venouy posted a similar version at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joker Venom.

Venoumy also attempted to re-pad the template. When this was undone, the IP, which traces back to Jogoblin's general location, readded the tangential material. J Greb (talk) 22:36, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * And Venoumy just posted a user page that mirrors Jogoblin's.

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - - Looking at deleted contribs and the phases used is surely suspicious enough to warrant a CU. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;  17:01, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Rather to check, when it's this obvious. WilliamH (talk) 21:31, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Obvious sock blocked and tagged and master blocked for a week. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 16:48, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

26 July 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Maybe a duck since Injuegue's first edit was to create this - User:Injuegue/Joker Venom - complete with AFC template. At this point I think the CU is needed to determine if tis is a on-off. J Greb (talk) 22:10, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - I think we have enough evidence with Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joker Venom and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joker Venom (2) -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  01:17, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
 * With no current disruption and one of the two suspected accounts already blocked, I don't think an investigation is required. Please re-open in the event of subsequent misconduct by Injuegue. AGK  [•] 00:36, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

24 August 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Karenkyle's editing style is similat to Jogobs, but that hasn't been enough to come back here. This set on their talk page -  [en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Karankyle&diff=508923558&oldid=508917658] - though is. The only Joker (comics) article for creation pages and deletions I've been involved with recently are Jogoblin's and their socks.

Right now Jogoblin has been indefinitely blocked for 1) abusing multiple accounts and 2) stating he thinks his computer/account was hacked. This would be their seconde attempt to start again with a new account doing the same thing.

RedhoodID is a brand new account with a single article reate edit - to Talk:Joker (comics). Additionally, Karankyle has this edit there - - posting as RedhoodID.

I'd like the checkuser run this time to clarify what exactly is going on and to shake out anymore of these alt accounts. J Greb (talk) 22:06, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

What's wrong with you all? My only accounts are Karankyle and RedhoodID. I don't even know this "Jogoblin". Besides, I don't commonly edit about the Joker like Jogoblin, I normally edit about Horrid Henry and Selina Kyle although I once in a while do something related to the Joker as I like him. Karankyle (talk) 13:14, 25 August 2012 (UTC)


 * And based on these - . I'm adding the following to the check user request:
 * Please note this is the second time the IP has cropped up in this. Also, the TH thread has since been moved to ANI.
 * - J Greb (talk) 14:12, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Please note this is the second time the IP has cropped up in this. Also, the TH thread has since been moved to ANI.
 * - J Greb (talk) 14:12, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * There is also a discussion going on at WP:ANI regarding this issue. -- Jayron  32  14:07, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  13:21, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * - to confirm block evasion and flush sleepers.

— Berean Hunter   (talk)  15:35, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Also, unless they are using the same computer or two computers with the same technical data, CU does not support a comprimised account. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  15:29, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * All are blocked and tagged so closing.