Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/John574/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Pretty obvious - 174.16.100.189 kept trying to wipe his User Talk page to get rid of warnings/ban notice, then tried to remove discussion about this from User talk:Sro23 who said "This no longer needs to be discussed so please remove." Mr. Vernon (talk) 15:45, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Furthermore, Don543, 66.87.150.232, and 66.87.150.25 have tried to blank this page. Adding them as probable socks.

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Everyone is blocked. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 18:33, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Vandalism on related suite of articles including Pier 1 Imports, Chili's and broadcaster articles. They basically stated they will create more socks here back in January. Brianhe (talk) 18:18, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Apologies, I just noticed the similarities to Sockpuppet investigations/John574 where two IPs also vandalized Chili's and KYGO-FM identically . This report should probably be re-mastered. - Brianhe (talk) 18:34, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

was the other case you were trying to remember Sockpuppet investigations/John574? - Brianhe (talk) 20:23, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * That would be the one. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 21:01, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Could a clerk or CU please add to the list? They are likely a sock based on the same behavior --Cameron11598 (Talk) 19:17, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Already handled, and these are all another sockmaster (the name of whom I can't recall at the moment) so I'm closing it. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 17:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Continued vandalism of Carly Smithson, radio stations and restaurant chains. Pattern-of-behavior compiled at User:Bri/Denver LTA. Representative edits from the accounts listed today are Bri (talk) 16:37, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * I added several socks I found today and am continuing to CU to get a comprehensive list. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 17:57, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * -  Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 17:57, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * (✅, strongly correlated temporally with a batch of socks)
 * (✅ and meet rough username pattern, but not created in correlation temporally with any other socks):
 * ❌ (Different all around in the technical data):
 * Note that this list may be incomplete. Their UA is very common on the ranges that they frequent, and so there are many accounts not listed here that are ✅, but that did not fit the username pattern, behavior pattern, and/or were not temporally related enough to these accounts for me to list them. I'm continuing my review, and if I confirm any others I will list them, but I'm confident this is the vast bulk of their socks. I will likely be instituting more rigorous range blocks when I'm completely finished. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 19:00, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:09, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * (✅, strongly correlated temporally with a batch of socks)
 * (✅ and meet rough username pattern, but not created in correlation temporally with any other socks):
 * ❌ (Different all around in the technical data):
 * Note that this list may be incomplete. Their UA is very common on the ranges that they frequent, and so there are many accounts not listed here that are ✅, but that did not fit the username pattern, behavior pattern, and/or were not temporally related enough to these accounts for me to list them. I'm continuing my review, and if I confirm any others I will list them, but I'm confident this is the vast bulk of their socks. I will likely be instituting more rigorous range blocks when I'm completely finished. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 19:00, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:09, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * (✅, strongly correlated temporally with a batch of socks)
 * (✅ and meet rough username pattern, but not created in correlation temporally with any other socks):
 * ❌ (Different all around in the technical data):
 * Note that this list may be incomplete. Their UA is very common on the ranges that they frequent, and so there are many accounts not listed here that are ✅, but that did not fit the username pattern, behavior pattern, and/or were not temporally related enough to these accounts for me to list them. I'm continuing my review, and if I confirm any others I will list them, but I'm confident this is the vast bulk of their socks. I will likely be instituting more rigorous range blocks when I'm completely finished. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 19:00, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:09, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * (✅, strongly correlated temporally with a batch of socks)
 * (✅ and meet rough username pattern, but not created in correlation temporally with any other socks):
 * ❌ (Different all around in the technical data):
 * Note that this list may be incomplete. Their UA is very common on the ranges that they frequent, and so there are many accounts not listed here that are ✅, but that did not fit the username pattern, behavior pattern, and/or were not temporally related enough to these accounts for me to list them. I'm continuing my review, and if I confirm any others I will list them, but I'm confident this is the vast bulk of their socks. I will likely be instituting more rigorous range blocks when I'm completely finished. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 19:00, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:09, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * (✅ and meet rough username pattern, but not created in correlation temporally with any other socks):
 * ❌ (Different all around in the technical data):
 * Note that this list may be incomplete. Their UA is very common on the ranges that they frequent, and so there are many accounts not listed here that are ✅, but that did not fit the username pattern, behavior pattern, and/or were not temporally related enough to these accounts for me to list them. I'm continuing my review, and if I confirm any others I will list them, but I'm confident this is the vast bulk of their socks. I will likely be instituting more rigorous range blocks when I'm completely finished. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 19:00, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:09, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * (✅ and meet rough username pattern, but not created in correlation temporally with any other socks):
 * ❌ (Different all around in the technical data):
 * Note that this list may be incomplete. Their UA is very common on the ranges that they frequent, and so there are many accounts not listed here that are ✅, but that did not fit the username pattern, behavior pattern, and/or were not temporally related enough to these accounts for me to list them. I'm continuing my review, and if I confirm any others I will list them, but I'm confident this is the vast bulk of their socks. I will likely be instituting more rigorous range blocks when I'm completely finished. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 19:00, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:09, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * (✅ and meet rough username pattern, but not created in correlation temporally with any other socks):
 * ❌ (Different all around in the technical data):
 * Note that this list may be incomplete. Their UA is very common on the ranges that they frequent, and so there are many accounts not listed here that are ✅, but that did not fit the username pattern, behavior pattern, and/or were not temporally related enough to these accounts for me to list them. I'm continuing my review, and if I confirm any others I will list them, but I'm confident this is the vast bulk of their socks. I will likely be instituting more rigorous range blocks when I'm completely finished. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 19:00, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:09, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * (✅ and meet rough username pattern, but not created in correlation temporally with any other socks):
 * ❌ (Different all around in the technical data):
 * Note that this list may be incomplete. Their UA is very common on the ranges that they frequent, and so there are many accounts not listed here that are ✅, but that did not fit the username pattern, behavior pattern, and/or were not temporally related enough to these accounts for me to list them. I'm continuing my review, and if I confirm any others I will list them, but I'm confident this is the vast bulk of their socks. I will likely be instituting more rigorous range blocks when I'm completely finished. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 19:00, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:09, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * (✅ and meet rough username pattern, but not created in correlation temporally with any other socks):
 * ❌ (Different all around in the technical data):
 * Note that this list may be incomplete. Their UA is very common on the ranges that they frequent, and so there are many accounts not listed here that are ✅, but that did not fit the username pattern, behavior pattern, and/or were not temporally related enough to these accounts for me to list them. I'm continuing my review, and if I confirm any others I will list them, but I'm confident this is the vast bulk of their socks. I will likely be instituting more rigorous range blocks when I'm completely finished. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 19:00, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:09, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * (✅ and meet rough username pattern, but not created in correlation temporally with any other socks):
 * ❌ (Different all around in the technical data):
 * Note that this list may be incomplete. Their UA is very common on the ranges that they frequent, and so there are many accounts not listed here that are ✅, but that did not fit the username pattern, behavior pattern, and/or were not temporally related enough to these accounts for me to list them. I'm continuing my review, and if I confirm any others I will list them, but I'm confident this is the vast bulk of their socks. I will likely be instituting more rigorous range blocks when I'm completely finished. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 19:00, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:09, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * (✅ and meet rough username pattern, but not created in correlation temporally with any other socks):
 * ❌ (Different all around in the technical data):
 * Note that this list may be incomplete. Their UA is very common on the ranges that they frequent, and so there are many accounts not listed here that are ✅, but that did not fit the username pattern, behavior pattern, and/or were not temporally related enough to these accounts for me to list them. I'm continuing my review, and if I confirm any others I will list them, but I'm confident this is the vast bulk of their socks. I will likely be instituting more rigorous range blocks when I'm completely finished. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 19:00, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:09, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * (✅ and meet rough username pattern, but not created in correlation temporally with any other socks):
 * ❌ (Different all around in the technical data):
 * Note that this list may be incomplete. Their UA is very common on the ranges that they frequent, and so there are many accounts not listed here that are ✅, but that did not fit the username pattern, behavior pattern, and/or were not temporally related enough to these accounts for me to list them. I'm continuing my review, and if I confirm any others I will list them, but I'm confident this is the vast bulk of their socks. I will likely be instituting more rigorous range blocks when I'm completely finished. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 19:00, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:09, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * (✅ and meet rough username pattern, but not created in correlation temporally with any other socks):
 * ❌ (Different all around in the technical data):
 * Note that this list may be incomplete. Their UA is very common on the ranges that they frequent, and so there are many accounts not listed here that are ✅, but that did not fit the username pattern, behavior pattern, and/or were not temporally related enough to these accounts for me to list them. I'm continuing my review, and if I confirm any others I will list them, but I'm confident this is the vast bulk of their socks. I will likely be instituting more rigorous range blocks when I'm completely finished. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 19:00, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:09, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * (✅ and meet rough username pattern, but not created in correlation temporally with any other socks):
 * ❌ (Different all around in the technical data):
 * Note that this list may be incomplete. Their UA is very common on the ranges that they frequent, and so there are many accounts not listed here that are ✅, but that did not fit the username pattern, behavior pattern, and/or were not temporally related enough to these accounts for me to list them. I'm continuing my review, and if I confirm any others I will list them, but I'm confident this is the vast bulk of their socks. I will likely be instituting more rigorous range blocks when I'm completely finished. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 19:00, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:09, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * (✅ and meet rough username pattern, but not created in correlation temporally with any other socks):
 * ❌ (Different all around in the technical data):
 * Note that this list may be incomplete. Their UA is very common on the ranges that they frequent, and so there are many accounts not listed here that are ✅, but that did not fit the username pattern, behavior pattern, and/or were not temporally related enough to these accounts for me to list them. I'm continuing my review, and if I confirm any others I will list them, but I'm confident this is the vast bulk of their socks. I will likely be instituting more rigorous range blocks when I'm completely finished. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 19:00, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:09, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * (✅ and meet rough username pattern, but not created in correlation temporally with any other socks):
 * ❌ (Different all around in the technical data):
 * Note that this list may be incomplete. Their UA is very common on the ranges that they frequent, and so there are many accounts not listed here that are ✅, but that did not fit the username pattern, behavior pattern, and/or were not temporally related enough to these accounts for me to list them. I'm continuing my review, and if I confirm any others I will list them, but I'm confident this is the vast bulk of their socks. I will likely be instituting more rigorous range blocks when I'm completely finished. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 19:00, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:09, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * ❌ (Different all around in the technical data):
 * Note that this list may be incomplete. Their UA is very common on the ranges that they frequent, and so there are many accounts not listed here that are ✅, but that did not fit the username pattern, behavior pattern, and/or were not temporally related enough to these accounts for me to list them. I'm continuing my review, and if I confirm any others I will list them, but I'm confident this is the vast bulk of their socks. I will likely be instituting more rigorous range blocks when I'm completely finished. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 19:00, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:09, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note that this list may be incomplete. Their UA is very common on the ranges that they frequent, and so there are many accounts not listed here that are ✅, but that did not fit the username pattern, behavior pattern, and/or were not temporally related enough to these accounts for me to list them. I'm continuing my review, and if I confirm any others I will list them, but I'm confident this is the vast bulk of their socks. I will likely be instituting more rigorous range blocks when I'm completely finished. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 19:00, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:09, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

See User:Bri/Denver LTA and obvious connections in usernames and themes. Themes are intertwined and include (1) Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores page blanker, (2) Reunion Tower ibx scrambling, (3) User talk:Bri/Denver LTA diddling. Several of the users and the IP already implicitly (via IP geolocation) or explicitly group in the User:Bri/Denver LTA actor; John574 is the main SPI for the LTA case. Note that this implies Sockpuppet investigations/Cody MR folds into John574. Diffs supporting the linkage:


 * Tina324 (CU block = John574) - Love's
 * George998 (CU block = John574) - Love's
 * Lucy423 (CU block = John574) - Love's
 * Jimmy325 - Reunion Tower
 * 97.118.173.42 - LTA talk
 * Cody MR, MZ, Wxyz, MZR, MR @ Reunion Tower -
 * Sam MT - Reunion Tower
 * Dave Schmedrick - Love's Reunion Tower
 * Chris MRZA CU block) - Reunion Tower LTA talk
 * Charlie W (CU block) - Reunion Tower LTA talk

Additional linkage with vandalism to 1999 eclipse page: CodyWxyz ; Sam MT ; Dave Schmedrick ; Chris MRZA ; Charlie W. Similar vandalism at April 2014 lunar eclipse by same plus Cody MZR

One more: Charlie W and Denver IP #2 have both vandalized Signpost subscription page

Ends ☆ Bri (talk) 02:58, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

75.166.96.143: Simple English vandal repeating prior unreported socks. Craig ZM: vandal here. ☆ Bri (talk) 00:09, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Looks like this has been dealt with, closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:53, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Page blanking at usual pages of this LTA; see User:Bri/Denver LTA -- compare pages to Special:Contributions/JefferyS nearly the same incl Chili's blanking, KSCS ☆ Bri (talk) 00:07, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Doug ZM ditto

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked by . Closing. Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 22:17, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Refer to User:Bri/Denver LTA for background and common behavior. New sock returning to same pages recently vandalized by the LTA.


 * compare CU confirmed example to . Blanking is their modus operandi
 * The Texarkana blanking seen today also initiated with a 97.118 IP  consistent with same LTA.
 * Per same LTA, sockfarm has a history of vandlizing cross-wiki userpages of investigators, and has done so again in this case:

Filed ☆ Bri (talk) 20:40, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Joe Pawlowski : Chili's, Texarkana page blanker. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:12, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:10, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
 * - To check for sleepers. Thanks, GABgab 00:03, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * , closing.

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

See User:Bri/Denver LTA. Vandalism to the same articles Sro23 (talk) 01:47, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' Mark Bowman, Carl Wilsonn, Joe Pawlowski - same blanking behavior esp. Chili's. ☆ Bri (talk) 03:17, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please extend block to indef. Sro23 (talk) 01:48, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Account now globally locked, closing. GABgab 04:23, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Blanking KYGO, Chili's, Love's etc. per User:Bri/Denver LTA ☆ Bri (talk) 06:44, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Both now blocked, closing. GABgab 17:01, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Denver radio station and Chili's blanking  per User:Bri/Denver LTA ☆ Bri (talk) 18:06, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Account now blocked. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 18:35, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

No doubt this matches WP:Long-term abuse/Denver LTA KSCS & Chili's vandalism. Listing here for case continuity. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:50, 6 June 2018 (UTC) ☆ Bri (talk) 17:50, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * There doesn't appear to be anything to do here. Closing.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:19, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Blanked a number of pages, including a few SPI's and Carly Smithson. Diffs - [] [] [] [] IanDBeacon (talk) 16:15, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * These all belong to Sockpuppet investigations/John574. ✅:
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:30, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:30, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:30, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:30, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:30, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:30, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:30, 6 June 2018 (UTC)


 * - Could an admin clerk please merge this accordingly? Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:19, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ and closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  18:39, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See also Long-term abuse/Denver LTA IanDBeacon (talk) 23:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Account already blocked. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 23:44, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Denver LTA. Blanked KGYO-FM. IanDBeacon (talk) 21:43, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

US retail vandalism, Texas page blanking matches WP:LTA/DENVER ☆ Bri (talk) 15:55, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Already blocked. I throttled the usual, trollish unblock requests. Favonian (talk) 16:00, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Per this edit. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 15:19, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Already blocked. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:07, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

User talk page vandalism, see contribs. WP:Duck, matches WP:LTA/DENVER clearly. IanDBeacon (talk) 18:45, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Definitely related to each other and probably to the Denver Dodo. In any case, both blocked. Favonian (talk) 18:52, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

- FlightTime Phone  ( open channel ) 19:38, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Thank you. Sorry, I was half-way out my door (and my significant other giving me the eye) or I would of provided more info. Thanx again, -  FlightTime Phone  ( open channel ) 21:44, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Both accounts blocked, as well as the one that was vandalizing this page. Next time evidence would be useful. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:57, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Reopening to request a merge with WP:Sockpuppet investigations/John574, a.k.a. WP:LTA/DENVER. Any lingering doubts regarding its identity was removed by the antics of . Courtesy ping . Favonian (talk) 17:44, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Done. Closing. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:22, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See contribs, edits on KSCS and my user talk page. Quack! IanDBeacon (talk) 15:41, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' Apparently, another sock, User: Chance Wiliams was just blocked by. --IanDBeacon (talk) 16:05, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Chance Olsen is ✅ to . . Apparently, most accounts in this farm are globally locked.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:00, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * is also ✅.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:07, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Locked both. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 16:10, 24 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 16:50, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Disruption on my user talk page. See contribs. WP:DUCK. Matches WP:LTA/DENVER as well. IanDBeacon (talk) 15:16, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' Account now blocked by User:Favonian. Please still do a sleeper check prior to closing as he has socked for quite a few days now. --IanDBeacon (talk) 15:26, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Endorsing for a CU to perform a sleeper check.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   03:28, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
 * No additional accounts visible, and the underlying IP has already been handled. ST47 (talk) 03:33, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See contribs. Vandalism on my user talk page. WP:DUCK IanDBeacon (talk) 15:54, 22 April 2020 (UTC) And now they are edit warring. Please be sure you do a sleeper check, and block the underlying IP and it’s web host too. IanDBeacon (talk) 16:10, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' has since blocked these. Please still perform a sleeper check prior to closing. IanDBeacon (talk) 16:24, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * CU was just run not even a week ago. I don't see how another one will do any good. Closing. Sro23 (talk) 14:52, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

As before. IanDBeacon (talk) 16:16, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Already blocked. Sro23 (talk) 14:53, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See edits made by User:Maria Acuña Corbae. Do a sleeper check on this one too. IanDBeacon (talk) 15:33, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' All handled, run a sleeper check and close.IanDBeacon (talk) 15:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Favonian (talk) 15:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See WP:ANI report made by user - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=959779455. , matches WP:LTA/DENVER IanDBeacon (talk) 15:50, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Favonian (talk) 16:04, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See report made by this user on ANI. WP:DUCK through megaphone. IanDBeacon (talk) 15:16, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked, gagged, closing. Favonian (talk) 15:21, 18 August 2020 (UTC)