Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Johnclarencevelasco/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Creation of draft Draft:John Clarence Velasco, and as well trying to push the draft to RENXE in the mainspace. Requesting creation salt on REXNE, if possible. – robertsky (talk) 17:41, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * is ✅ to:
 * and to:
 * All have been involved in this same set of promo. -- ferret (talk) 18:30, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
 * -- ferret (talk) 18:33, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Noting also which I did not check but is obvious. -- ferret (talk) 18:45, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Everything seems to be in order, closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 23:28, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
 * All have been involved in this same set of promo. -- ferret (talk) 18:30, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
 * -- ferret (talk) 18:33, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Noting also which I did not check but is obvious. -- ferret (talk) 18:45, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Everything seems to be in order, closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 23:28, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Everything seems to be in order, closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 23:28, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Created Sassa Gurl (now at Draft:Sassa Gurl) which has previously been created by blocked socks User:Renxeees and User:Rerenxeee. The writing style is also similar to previous socks, cf Special:Diff/1049422810 and Special:Diff/1048126185 by blocked sock Mamakopink with Sassamiss' post Special:Diff/1053897711. Sassamiss has disclosed a paid relationship, Special:Diff/1053896146. bonadea contributions talk 23:26, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

"Unfair"? Seriously? Non-admins cannot see deleted articles, and anybody who can read English can see the similarities in style in the diffs provided. I did not say or even imply that the disclosure was any part of the reason for the SPI. In any case, the creator had ignored requests from three different people to make the mandatory disclosure on their user page; their disclosure was in the form of a Teahouse post saying that they had been paid and wanted the COI template to be removed from the draft,. They still haven't made a disclosure, and (like the other accounts in the archive) they have repeately moved the draft to mainspace. --bonadea contributions talk 09:18, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The draft created by Sassamiss is substantially different from the previously deleted one. The overall structure is the same, but I assume that's because they're working from the same job description.  In short, I see no reason to believe this is the same person as the previous socks.  We ask (well, require) paid editors to disclose that they're being paid.  Sassamiss did this.  As much as I dislike paid editing, it's not fair to tell people that it's allowed as long as they disclose and then drag them to SPI when they do.  Closing with no action. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:30, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Pro forma; I am aware Roy declined a check, but I felt the evidence was compelling enough to merit a check. GeneralNotability (talk) 18:02, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Sassamiss is ✅ to Mamakopink and Hahakdog21. . GeneralNotability (talk) 18:03, 13 November 2021 (UTC)