Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jojojohnson2/Archive

Report date March 28 2009, 01:25 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by Killing Vector (talk)

contributions include identical actions and very similar summaries to 's and 's. Same style of one-sentence user page and talk page. Same fixation on the BJCP.


 * User has removed sock notification.

Killing Vector (talk) 01:25, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions
 * Blocked as a sock, all done.  MBisanz  talk 03:54, 29 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Archiving. Foxy Loxy  Pounce! 04:39, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Report date March 30 2009, 20:27 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * Evidence submitted by Killing Vector (talk)

contributions and pattern of harassment match User:Jojojohnson2, User:sgt dizzle guy, and related cases.

RoyalIvey's contributions add links to the BJCP to beer style articles and suppress links to websites maintained by User:Patto1ro and others: 

Jojojohnson's do the same:

This is an elaboration of the pattern from [[User:Miklebe], who was blocked for spamming and impersonation:     --[[User:Killing Vector|Killing Vector]] (talk) 09:29, 31 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
 * You are asked to provide evidence of abusive sockpuppetry, not merely assertions. Evidence means supplying diffs. Mayalld (talk) 06:54, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. --Killing Vector (talk) 09:29, 31 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I've generated a report for this request.  Syn  ergy 00:29, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions
 * Blocked the sock indef, please tag and archive. ——  nix eagle email me 06:25, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Archiving. Foxy Loxy  Pounce! 06:36, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Report date April 7 2009, 23:26 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by Killing Vector (talk)

Identical spamming of beer style articles with links to the BJCP style guide:
 * User:BJCP:
 * User:Jojojohnson2:

Harrassing User:Patto1ro
 * User:BJCP:
 * User:LouPepe:

See also Long_term_abuse


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by Killing Vector (talk) 23:26, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests


 * All three accounts are already blocked, as such CheckUser would not provide anything useful here. Also, I am not sure which ArbCom sanction you are referring to. Tiptoety  talk 23:32, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Additional information needed: Please provide a code letter. SPCUClerkbot (talk) 23:27, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions
 * No action taken, socks already blocked. Tiptoety  talk 23:35, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Report date April 10 2009, 08:26 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Killing Vector (talk) 08:26, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Same spamming of BJCP link as in previous instances of this sockpuppeteer, to same articles:
 * Aware of the long-term abuse report against this user:
 * Evidence submitted by Killing Vector (talk)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions
 * Blocked for two weeks for block evasion. Tiptoety  talk 18:13, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Report date April 12 2009, 09:03 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by Killing Vector (talk)

Both users are spamming the BJCP link.
 * Aaaahfreakout:
 * Yosheko:

Both users started editing after Jojojohnson's most recent sock was blocked on the 10th. Sockpuppet_investigations/Jojojohnson2/Archive

Yosheko uses the "do not revert" edit summary, as previous socks have.  Killing Vector (talk) 09:03, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Roscoejankins was created just after the above was filed and has made two edits: the BJCP clause and an entry on User:Patto1ro's page. 

Oh, another one. Brazzersbrazzers spams the BJCP link  and tries to go after me an Patto1ro in their edits


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Evidence checks out Valley2 city ‽ 06:25, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Indef blocks all around. Clerk please add to archive. Valley2 city ‽ 06:25, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions

Report date April 15 2009, 23:14 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Same as before: spamming of BJCP link. deleting Patto1ro's sites.  Killing Vector (talk) 23:14, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Killing Vector (talk)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

- Can we have a checkuser look into this user and identify any sleepers and see about blocking the underlaying IP/Ranges please? This is getting silly. (See the archives for evidence of persistant socking). ——  nix eagle email me 01:44, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
 * Note that I am blocking the currently listed account indef. ——  nix eagle email me 01:44, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * - Tiptoety  talk 02:48, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions
 * is . Rooted out sleepers on sole Jojojohnson2 IP, and IP blocked. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 16:28, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Report date May 26 2009, 01:31 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Same as before: linkspamming & reverting User:Patto1ro and User:Mikebe. 

Jojojohnson2 diffs:

Killing Vector (talk) 01:31, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Killing Vector


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by Killing Vector (talk) 01:31, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests

Previous socks have had a checkuser and IP block applied. Puppetmaster has used sleepers before. --Killing Vector (talk) 01:31, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

This is a DUCK case, but we should see about blocking the underlying IP/range. — Jake   Wartenberg  02:31, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

CU says range too big; ain't gonna happen. — Jake   Wartenberg  02:55, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions

Report date May 26 2009, 03:40 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Same BJCP link spamming. Yes, an SPI case from this puppetmaster was closed like ten minutes ago. 

Jojojohnson2 diffs:

Killing Vector (talk) 03:40, 26 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Evidence submitted by Killing Vector


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions
 * Indeffed - obvious sock. J.delanoy gabs adds  03:46, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Report date May 30 2009, 09:16 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Same blanking of links on Beer style. New user using undo feature. 

Previous sock User:shoelessjoeboy:

Killing Vector (talk) 09:15, 30 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Evidence submitted by Killing Vector


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions

Blocked and tagged. Looking at the archive, it appears the IP range is too big for a block. Oh well. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 13:11, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Report date July 1 2009, 17:44 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by Killing Vector


 * Same fixation with Editor437 as the Newcrewforu puppetmaster has displayed in the past:, edit summary of
 * Same BJCP spamming as the puppetmaster has displayed in the past:

Newcrewforu MO, for reference: LTA

Killing Vector (talk) 17:44, 1 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions

Blocked and tagged. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 10:58, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Report date July 7 2009, 02:00 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * Evidence submitted by Killing Vector


 * Same BJCP spamming as the puppetmaster has displayed in the past:
 * Same fixation with User:Patto1ro

Newcrewforu MO, for reference: LTA

--Killing Vector (talk) 02:00, 7 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions

Blocked/tagged. I'm sorry to say that, looking at the archive, the range is far too large to block. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 13:36, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Report date July 8 2009, 14:57 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by Killing Vector

Part of the same wave of attacks as here.


 * Same BJCP linkspamming as the puppetmaster has displayed in the past:  vs
 * Same fixation with User:Patto1ro; username "ronstopit" is designed to attack Patto1ro.

I have now filed literally dozens of these SPI reports against the Jojojohnson2/newcrewforu user. Is there anything else that can be done? --Killing Vector (talk) 14:57, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, you can request a CheckUser to see if an IP block or range block would be possible. I have done so below. Tiptoety  talk 15:01, 8 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Request for CheckUser
 * Requested by Tiptoety  talk 15:01, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * - To see if a range block is possible. Tiptoety  talk 15:01, 8 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
 * I have blocked and tagged Ronstopit. Tiptoety  talk 15:01, 8 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Conclusions
 * ✅. IP blocked. This account is on a different ISP, so a rangeblock is not plausible. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 19:44, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Report date July 10 2009, 00:39 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by Killing Vector

Same BJCP spamming as previous socks. .

Same harrassment of User:Patto1ro and User:Mikebe:

Newcrewforu/Jojojohnson2 editor MO: LTA

--Killing Vector (talk) 00:39, 10 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions
 * The account has already been blocked by Checkuser . I went ahead and tagged. Tiptoety  talk 04:12, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Report date July 15 2009, 13:53 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by Killing Vector

All user contributions fit the usual linkspamming-reverting pattern, on the usual batch of articles.

This user: Special:Contributions/KeepTheBJCP

Newcrewforu/Jojojohnson2 editor MO: LTA --Killing Vector (talk) 13:53, 15 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions
 * Blocked and tagged. Tiptoety  talk 19:49, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Report date August 2 2009, 23:24 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by Killing Vector

Same BJCP spamming as previous socks. 

Newcrewforu/Jojojohnson2 editor MO: LTA

--Killing Vector (talk) 23:24, 2 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions

Blocked/tagged. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 23:26, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Report date August 21 2009, 14:40 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by Killing Vector

Contribs and content of user pages the same as in previous Jojojohnson2 socks.


 * Never mind, already blocked by User:Gogo Dodo. --Killing Vector (talk) 14:42, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Killing Vector (talk) 14:40, 21 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions

Evidence submitted by Gogo Dodo
I'm not entirely sure whose sockpuppet this is. The edit of reinserting bjcp.org link makes me think this is a potential Jojojohnson2 sockpuppet. The undoing on Continuation War shows as on obvious sockpuppet of. The total editor history shows a pattern of undoing recent edits by who is active in dealing with Jojojohnson2 sockpuppets. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:58, 23 October 2009 (UTC)


 * The Soviet Offensive user *might* be Jojojohnson2, but I think it's more likely that it's a return of the Kven user who's been stalking Continuation War and other Finland-related pages for years. --Killing Vector (talk) 20:32, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

CheckUser requests
Requested by Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:58, 23 October 2009 (UTC)


 * . NW ( Talk ) 19:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * is ✅. is ❌. Brandon (talk) 22:42, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Conclusions

 * Tagged and blocked appropriately. <b style="color:navy;">NW</b> ( Talk ) 22:46, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Killing Vector
Same BJCP spamming as previous stops Killing Vector (talk) 23:49, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Conclusions

 * Blocked and tagged. <b style="color:navy;">NW</b> ( Talk ) 02:57, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Crossmr
See Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents Hoodatdat was blocked as a sockpuppet for reverting to the same versions by other puppets on pages. With that in mind it might be prudent to make sure they're related and if there are any other accounts there now.Crossmr (talk) 04:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

CheckUser requests
Requested by Crossmr (talk) 04:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC)


 * - Tiptoety  talk 07:18, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
✅ =

All of these are already blocked. J.delanoy <sup style="color:red;">gabs <sub style="color:blue;">adds 19:22, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Conclusions

 * All tagged appropriately. <b style="color:navy;">NW</b> ( Talk ) 21:31, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * - New user that appears to be a sockpuppet
 * - blocked sockpuppet of Jojojohnson, whose editwarring has been continued by RoodneyKang

Evidence submitted by Ronz
RoodneyKang's edit warring in Beef phanaeng is a continuation an edit-war by Vector by  over the same external link.

RoodneyKang's edit warring in David Stern is over information originally added by Vector by. --Ronz (talk) 18:07, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

RoodneyKang has edited only two other articles, David Glick and Rohrbach Brewing Company, fitting the pattern of Vector by and other Jojojohnson2 socks of editing articles about breweries and Jewish BLPs. --Ronz (talk) 00:42, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Conclusions
Blocked and tagged. MuZemike 01:37, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by MER-C
It looks like our old friend has taken up spamdexing for a living. . Short story: all listed accounts above spammed

plus a CU confirmed sock. Can we get year-long blocks on the IPs and a sleeper check please? Nothing but spam there. MER-C 10:35, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by MER-C 10:35, 21 January 2010 (UTC) Tim Song (talk) 11:23, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * It may be someone else; at least, the IPs are in India this time. In any case ✅ all the listed accounts and IPs match, plus GodhaR. The IPs are safe to block long-term. Dominic·t 07:43, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

All accounts tagged, including the IPs. –MuZemike 19:13, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

09 January 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This user is the latest of a series of sockpuppets that vandalise my edits. Look at his edits and you'll see that they are almost all reverts of my edits. He has used dozens of user names in the past to attack my contributions. Patto1ro (talk) 14:05, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Not pushing BJCP this time, but still pushing minor sites and using the same aggressive style of editing. Indef blocked via WP:DUCK.  Closing. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;  Join WER 18:17, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

11 January 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Yet another sock puppet of Jojojohnson2 adding BJCP link spam. Patto1ro (talk) 13:33, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅,, no obvious sleepers. T. Canens (talk) 14:04, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Dennis Brown - 2&cent;    &copy;  Join WER 14:50, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

16 June 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Strongly suspect this is another sock puppet of Jojojohnson2. Repeated Jojojounson2's previous vandalism of the Manischewitz page, and when I reverted, went around to other unrelated pages reverting my own earlier edits. MadPoster (talk) 15:26, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

30 June 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

MadPoster (talk) 18:46, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * This isn't much of a report, and there's nothing to do here, anyway. Bbb23 (talk) 19:00, 4 July 2014 (UTC)